Abstract 4131439: Routine Social Isolation Screening Among Adults with Cardiovascular Disease: A Survival Analysis

Background: Evidence linking social isolation to cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality has grown in recent years. Still, information on how this may manifest in real world settings and its implications for screening practices is limited. In 2019, our large national integrated health care system implemented screening for social isolation as part of a broader universal social risk assessment. This repository of screening data was joined to administrative claims to test these associations in real world data and explore differences by demographic and medical factors. Methods: Social isolation responses recorded from 2019-2022 were included for a cohort of adult health plan members with documented atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We selected a single random assessment for each member and retained any other responses for sensitivity analyses. Cohort members had at least 10 months of enrollment surrounding assessment date for use as the baseline period and were followed for 365 days. We used cox proportional hazards regression with right censoring for coverage gaps to estimate the risk of all-cause mortality conferred by social isolation. We used Poisson regression to model the rate of inpatient stays. Results: There were 881 deaths among 7,484 members (18% of those with social isolation; 11% of those without). The isolated group skewed less male (54% vs. 65%, p <0.001) and older (68.4 [SD 12.7] vs. 67.5 [SD 12.6] years, p <0.05) than those not isolated. At baseline, the isolated group had higher rates of mean inpatient stays (2.3 [SD 1.9] vs. 1.9 [SD 1.6], p <0.001), ED visits (1.2 [SD 1.9] vs. 0.9 [SD 1.6], p < 0.001), and smoking (50% vs. 44%, p < 0.05), and a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (3.6 [SD 2.6] vs. 3.0 [SD 2.4], p < 0.001). Adjusted survival models suggested an independent 33% increase in all-cause mortality risk among those screening positive for social isolation (1.33 HR 95% CI 1.10, 1.62). Adjusted Poisson models found a similar increase in inpatient stays (1.36 IRR 95% CI 1.14, 1.62). Conclusions: Our findings corroborate the association between social isolation and morbidity and mortality among those with known ASCVD. The effect for social isolation was similar in magnitude to clinical comorbidities and smoking, suggesting that routine screening for social isolation may provide valuable information for assessing and managing the risk of death among patients with ASCVD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4131439
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4131439: Routine Social Isolation Screening Among Adults with Cardiovascular Disease: A Survival Analysis

Matthew S. Nudy, Emily Brignone, Lawrence I. Sinoway, Kathleen Galper
1 links
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4131439: Routine Social Isolation Screening Among Adults with Cardiovascular Disease: A Survival Analysis

Matthew S. Nudy, Emily Brignone, Lawrence I. Sinoway, Kathleen Galper
article en

Abstract

Background: Evidence linking social isolation to cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality has grown in recent years. Still, information on how this may manifest in real world settings and its implications for screening practices is limited. In 2019, our large national integrated health care system implemented screening for social isolation as part of a broader universal social risk assessment. This repository of screening data was joined to administrative claims to test these associations in real world data and explore differences by demographic and medical factors. Methods: Social isolation responses recorded from 2019-2022 were included for a cohort of adult health plan members with documented atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We selected a single random assessment for each member and retained any other responses for sensitivity analyses. Cohort members had at least 10 months of enrollment surrounding assessment date for use as the baseline period and were followed for 365 days. We used cox proportional hazards regression with right censoring for coverage gaps to estimate the risk of all-cause mortality conferred by social isolation. We used Poisson regression to model the rate of inpatient stays. Results: There were 881 deaths among 7,484 members (18% of those with social isolation; 11% of those without). The isolated group skewed less male (54% vs. 65%, p <0.001) and older (68.4 [SD 12.7] vs. 67.5 [SD 12.6] years, p <0.05) than those not isolated. At baseline, the isolated group had higher rates of mean inpatient stays (2.3 [SD 1.9] vs. 1.9 [SD 1.6], p <0.001), ED visits (1.2 [SD 1.9] vs. 0.9 [SD 1.6], p < 0.001), and smoking (50% vs. 44%, p < 0.05), and a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (3.6 [SD 2.6] vs. 3.0 [SD 2.4], p < 0.001). Adjusted survival models suggested an independent 33% increase in all-cause mortality risk among those screening positive for social isolation (1.33 HR 95% CI 1.10, 1.62). Adjusted Poisson models found a similar increase in inpatient stays (1.36 IRR 95% CI 1.14, 1.62). Conclusions: Our findings corroborate the association between social isolation and morbidity and mortality among those with known ASCVD. The effect for social isolation was similar in magnitude to clinical comorbidities and smoking, suggesting that routine screening for social isolation may provide valuable information for assessing and managing the risk of death among patients with ASCVD.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.