Abstract 4129733: Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Effect on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Total Cholesterol Levels Independent of Weight Reduction: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression of Placebo-controlled Randomized Controlled Tr

Background: The impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on lipid components is unclear. The objective of this study was to measure the lipid-lowering effect of GLP-1RAs. Methods: A thorough database search was performed to identify placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on GLP-1RA therapy through January 2023. From these trials, data was extracted and a robust statistical analysis was performed using a random effects model to determine outcomes with weighted mean difference (MD) in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was the mean difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Secondary outcomes were mean differences in total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein-C (HLD-C), and very low-density lipoprotein-C (VLDL-C). To account for covariates, subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed. Results: A total of 33 studies were included in the final meta-analysis carried out between 2008 and 2023, which were conducted in 26 countries. Of the 5,918 participants, the study population comprised 2,603 (44%) males and 3,315 (56%) females, aged between 33.7 and 65.9 years. GLP-1RAs significantly reduced LDL-C compared to placebo (MD -2.93, 95% CI (-5.01, -0.85), P=0.01). Treatment effect was consistent regardless of duration of treatment;12 weeks or less MD: -5.39, 95% CI (-10.36, -0.42), P=0.03 vs >12 weeks MD: -2.39, 95% CI (-4.70, -0.007), P=0.04, P interaction 0.28). In our analysis, GLP-1RA reduced TC by ~7 mg/dl. There was no significant reduction in triglycerides (MD = -7.19, 95% CI (- 15.01, 0.62], P=0.07) and VLDL-C ~4 mg/dl (MD = -3.99, 95%, CI (-8.73, 0.75), P=0.10). Furthermore, GLP-1RA did not increase HDL-C (MD = -0.12, 95% CI (-0.73, 0.49], P=0.69. Regression analysis determined that weight loss did not affect the treatment effect on LDL-C (tau2=28.38, I2=99.83, R2=0.0, p=0.67), and total cholesterol (tau2=93.6, I2=99.86, R2=0.0, p=0.92). Conclusion: Patients on GLP-1RA experienced modest LDL-C and TC lowering compared to placebo. GLP-1RA did not decrease triglycerides and VLDL-C. GLP-1RA did not increase HDL-C.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4129733
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diet and metabolism studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4129733: Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Effect on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Total Cholesterol Levels Independent of Weight Reduction: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression of Placebo-controlled Randomized Controlled Tr

Wailea Faye Salva, Rajiv Hans Menghrajani, Drashti Desai, Melanie Chin et al.
1 citations
Circulation
Diet and metabolism studies
0.33
article

Abstract 4129733: Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Effect on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Total Cholesterol Levels Independent of Weight Reduction: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression of Placebo-controlled Randomized Controlled Tr

Wailea Faye Salva, Rajiv Hans Menghrajani, Drashti Desai, Melanie Chin, Frederick Berro Rivera, GERARD FRANCIS MANGUBAT, Sarang Choi, Jade Monica Marie Ruyeras
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: The impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on lipid components is unclear. The objective of this study was to measure the lipid-lowering effect of GLP-1RAs. Methods: A thorough database search was performed to identify placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on GLP-1RA therapy through January 2023. From these trials, data was extracted and a robust statistical analysis was performed using a random effects model to determine outcomes with weighted mean difference (MD) in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was the mean difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Secondary outcomes were mean differences in total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein-C (HLD-C), and very low-density lipoprotein-C (VLDL-C). To account for covariates, subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed. Results: A total of 33 studies were included in the final meta-analysis carried out between 2008 and 2023, which were conducted in 26 countries. Of the 5,918 participants, the study population comprised 2,603 (44%) males and 3,315 (56%) females, aged between 33.7 and 65.9 years. GLP-1RAs significantly reduced LDL-C compared to placebo (MD -2.93, 95% CI (-5.01, -0.85), P=0.01). Treatment effect was consistent regardless of duration of treatment;12 weeks or less MD: -5.39, 95% CI (-10.36, -0.42), P=0.03 vs >12 weeks MD: -2.39, 95% CI (-4.70, -0.007), P=0.04, P interaction 0.28). In our analysis, GLP-1RA reduced TC by ~7 mg/dl. There was no significant reduction in triglycerides (MD = -7.19, 95% CI (- 15.01, 0.62], P=0.07) and VLDL-C ~4 mg/dl (MD = -3.99, 95%, CI (-8.73, 0.75), P=0.10). Furthermore, GLP-1RA did not increase HDL-C (MD = -0.12, 95% CI (-0.73, 0.49], P=0.69. Regression analysis determined that weight loss did not affect the treatment effect on LDL-C (tau2=28.38, I2=99.83, R2=0.0, p=0.67), and total cholesterol (tau2=93.6, I2=99.86, R2=0.0, p=0.92). Conclusion: Patients on GLP-1RA experienced modest LDL-C and TC lowering compared to placebo. GLP-1RA did not decrease triglycerides and VLDL-C. GLP-1RA did not increase HDL-C.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Lincoln Medical Center (US), Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Diet and metabolism studies
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.