Abstract 4128599: Facility-level Variation Underlying Low Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval in the United States

Background: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are commonly implanted in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) who are unable to receive anticoagulation, to protect against clot migration to the heart. With prolonged implantation, IVC filters are associated with complications: device fracture, migration, penetration into adjacent organs and worsened VTE. Two Federal Drug Administration advisories and multi-society guidelines have emphasized the importance of timely retrieval but national retrieval rates remain low (<30%). Aims: To quantify hospital-level variation in IVC filter retrieval , describe time-based retrieval rates and examine factors associated with retrieval. Methods: IVC Filter implantation for all patients >= 18 years was identified in the 2016-2020 inpatient and outpatient 100% limited data set Medicare files using claims codes. Hospital information for the implanting facility was cross-linked from the American Hospital Association and Healthcare Cost Report Information System files, including identifying information, teaching status, census location, operating margin and % uncompensated care. IVC filter retrieval rates and time to retrieval from implantation was calculated. Bayesian hospital profiling methods were used to quantify 1-year retrieval rate for all U.S. facilities, adjusting for patient factors – demographics, diagnostic indications and comorbidities. Results: Among Medicare beneficiaries, there were 140,481 IVC Filter implantations across 2,850 facilities. Excluding patients who died within 90 days of implantation (25.7%), retrieval rates at 3 months, 1 year and anytime were 7.9%, 18.7% and 20.0% respectively. IVC Filter retrieval within 1 year varied significantly at the facility-level, from 0-100% . Focusing on facilities with at least 13 IVC filter implantations each year (top 25%ile volume), 1-year retrieval ranged from 0 to 74.5%. Higher 1-year retrieval was seen among higher implantation volume (12.4% bottom quartile, 20.5% top quartile), teaching (21.1% teaching vs. 16.9% nonteaching) and non-safety net (21.1% low uncompensated care, 15.0% high uncompensated care) hospitals. Retrieval rates did not vary significantly by hospital operating margin or rurality. Conclusion(s): There is low overall IVC filter retrieval in the United States with large underlying facility-level variation. Focused examination of high-performing facilities could yield insights on how to improve device retrieval nationally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4128599
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4128599: Facility-level Variation Underlying Low Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval in the United States

Jonathan Lindquist, Robert K. Ryu, Premal Trivedi, Richard C. Lindrooth et al.
Circulation
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Abstract 4128599: Facility-level Variation Underlying Low Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval in the United States

Jonathan Lindquist, Robert K. Ryu, Premal Trivedi, Richard C. Lindrooth, Michael Ho, Evan Carey, Savannah Mierau, Lei Wang
article en

Abstract

Background: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are commonly implanted in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) who are unable to receive anticoagulation, to protect against clot migration to the heart. With prolonged implantation, IVC filters are associated with complications: device fracture, migration, penetration into adjacent organs and worsened VTE. Two Federal Drug Administration advisories and multi-society guidelines have emphasized the importance of timely retrieval but national retrieval rates remain low (<30%). Aims: To quantify hospital-level variation in IVC filter retrieval , describe time-based retrieval rates and examine factors associated with retrieval. Methods: IVC Filter implantation for all patients >= 18 years was identified in the 2016-2020 inpatient and outpatient 100% limited data set Medicare files using claims codes. Hospital information for the implanting facility was cross-linked from the American Hospital Association and Healthcare Cost Report Information System files, including identifying information, teaching status, census location, operating margin and % uncompensated care. IVC filter retrieval rates and time to retrieval from implantation was calculated. Bayesian hospital profiling methods were used to quantify 1-year retrieval rate for all U.S. facilities, adjusting for patient factors – demographics, diagnostic indications and comorbidities. Results: Among Medicare beneficiaries, there were 140,481 IVC Filter implantations across 2,850 facilities. Excluding patients who died within 90 days of implantation (25.7%), retrieval rates at 3 months, 1 year and anytime were 7.9%, 18.7% and 20.0% respectively. IVC Filter retrieval within 1 year varied significantly at the facility-level, from 0-100% . Focusing on facilities with at least 13 IVC filter implantations each year (top 25%ile volume), 1-year retrieval ranged from 0 to 74.5%. Higher 1-year retrieval was seen among higher implantation volume (12.4% bottom quartile, 20.5% top quartile), teaching (21.1% teaching vs. 16.9% nonteaching) and non-safety net (21.1% low uncompensated care, 15.0% high uncompensated care) hospitals. Retrieval rates did not vary significantly by hospital operating margin or rurality. Conclusion(s): There is low overall IVC filter retrieval in the United States with large underlying facility-level variation. Focused examination of high-performing facilities could yield insights on how to improve device retrieval nationally.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.