Abstract 4135127: Traveling more than a 20-mile radius to a Heart Failure Center can affect the quality of Heart Failure Care.

Introduction: We recognized the profound importance of access to care among patients with heart failure (HF). The geographical location of HF centers may significantly impact health outcomes, especially for those with limited transportation. This social determinant of health (SDOH) aspect is critical in bridging the gap in achieving HF care. Hypothesis/Methods: This was a single-center observational study conducted at a tertiary heart failure center in central Pennsylvania. We assessed the impact of travel distance by comparing patients who travel within a 20-mile radius to those who travel beyond a 20-mile radius. A total of 322 patients were referred to the HF clinic and enrolled in a guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) optimization program. Data collected included distance to Hershey Medical Center (HMC), health insurance coverage, HF etiology, onset, and echocardiogram. The distance was calculated based on the patient’s zip code. Results: Among patients enrolled in the HF-GDMT program, 194 travel within 20 miles, and 128 travel beyond a 20-mile radius to HMC. The mean travel distance to HMC was 9.1 miles (within) and 40.9 miles beyond 20 miles. The majority of patients were 81.3% white, 67% male, and the average age was 64. Most patients had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) at 92.9%, 63% nonischemic, and 57.5% new onset. The comorbidities in both groups were similar, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and coronary artery disease (CAD). When comparing both groups, those who traveled beyond the 20-mile radius to HMC had more chronic HF at 55.5% vs. 34% in patients who traveled within the 20-mile radius. Upon enrollment, most patients were on suboptimal doses of either 1 or 2 of the four pillars of GDMT for HFrEF. Conclusions: The findings of this study revealed that patients with HF who travel beyond a 20-mile radius to HMC are more likely to have chronic HF, suggesting a delay in seeking care. A delay in referral may affect the timely initiation of appropriate GDMT and will likely lead to worse health outcomes. This underscores the urgent need for interventions to address barriers like transportation to improve HF care, offering a potential avenue for better patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4135127
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4135127: Traveling more than a 20-mile radius to a Heart Failure Center can affect the quality of Heart Failure Care.

Claudia Mae Velasco, Omaima Ali, Gladys Baksh, Michele Haydo et al.
Circulation
Healthcare Systems and Practices
article

Abstract 4135127: Traveling more than a 20-mile radius to a Heart Failure Center can affect the quality of Heart Failure Care.

Claudia Mae Velasco, Omaima Ali, Gladys Baksh, Michele Haydo, Heather Reesor
article en

Abstract

Introduction: We recognized the profound importance of access to care among patients with heart failure (HF). The geographical location of HF centers may significantly impact health outcomes, especially for those with limited transportation. This social determinant of health (SDOH) aspect is critical in bridging the gap in achieving HF care. Hypothesis/Methods: This was a single-center observational study conducted at a tertiary heart failure center in central Pennsylvania. We assessed the impact of travel distance by comparing patients who travel within a 20-mile radius to those who travel beyond a 20-mile radius. A total of 322 patients were referred to the HF clinic and enrolled in a guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) optimization program. Data collected included distance to Hershey Medical Center (HMC), health insurance coverage, HF etiology, onset, and echocardiogram. The distance was calculated based on the patient’s zip code. Results: Among patients enrolled in the HF-GDMT program, 194 travel within 20 miles, and 128 travel beyond a 20-mile radius to HMC. The mean travel distance to HMC was 9.1 miles (within) and 40.9 miles beyond 20 miles. The majority of patients were 81.3% white, 67% male, and the average age was 64. Most patients had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) at 92.9%, 63% nonischemic, and 57.5% new onset. The comorbidities in both groups were similar, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and coronary artery disease (CAD). When comparing both groups, those who traveled beyond the 20-mile radius to HMC had more chronic HF at 55.5% vs. 34% in patients who traveled within the 20-mile radius. Upon enrollment, most patients were on suboptimal doses of either 1 or 2 of the four pillars of GDMT for HFrEF. Conclusions: The findings of this study revealed that patients with HF who travel beyond a 20-mile radius to HMC are more likely to have chronic HF, suggesting a delay in seeking care. A delay in referral may affect the timely initiation of appropriate GDMT and will likely lead to worse health outcomes. This underscores the urgent need for interventions to address barriers like transportation to improve HF care, offering a potential avenue for better patient outcomes.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Healthcare Systems and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.