Abstract 4135080: Relation of focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis to left bundle branch block in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and structurally normal heart

The role of fibrosis in etiology of left bundle branch block (LBBB) in still not defined. The aim of this study was to assess the relation of focal and diffuse LV fibrosis to LBBB in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and in patients with structurally normal heart. Materials and methods: 60 DCM with LBBB (DCM-LBBB group, 46.7% male, mean age 57[50;63] years), 50 non-LBBB DCM (78% male, mean age 43[32.3;54] years), 15 patients (53.3% male, mean age 39[28;50] years) with LBBB and no signs of structural heart disease and 10 healthy volunteers (HV) were included in the study. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) was performed in 15(24,6%) LBBB-DCM and 16(32%) non-LBBB DCM patients and allowed the quantification of collagen volume fraction (CVF, Fig.1A-D). All patients and HV underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) analysis. Obtained LGE LV images were post-proceed for core scar (CS) and gray zone (GZ) calculation and 3D reconstruction. Diffuse LV interstitial fibrosis was estimated on all LGE-CMR images with the novel introduced marker - diffuse intensity ratio (DIR). Results: DIR was validated on EMB samples: the percentage of CVF (8.2[4.6;10.8]%) correlated with the DIR value (0.71 ± 0.13) in the same segment (r=0.66, p<0.001, Fig.1E-F). The value of CVF (Fig1A-D) and LGE presence in the septum in both DCM groups (Fig2) was comparable (8.2[4.6; 10.3] versus 7.6[6.1;15.3]%, p=0.82 and 19 (31.7%) versus 17 (34%) patients in non-LBBB DCM group respectively, p=0.8) Moreover, the presence of LGE and midwall fibrosis in septum was not related to the QRS duration (p=0.93 and 0.59). In non-LBBB DCM patients the percentage of CS was significantly higher (4.0[1.55; 11.68]% versus 1.4[0.05;8.5]% in LBBB-DCM patients, p=0.047), whereas percentage of GZ and total fibrosis in both DCM groups was comparable (Fig.3A,B). DIR value was higher in patients with idiopathic LBBB than in HV (0.54±0.09 versus 0.34±0.1, p<0.001) while the percentage of GZ and CS was extremely low and did not differ from its amount in HV (Fig.3C,D). Conclusion: Neither focal (including midwall striae) nor interstitial fibrosis is associated with LBBB in patients with DCM. Diffuse inflammation in LBBB-DCM patients may contribute to the progression of systolic dysfunction but is not the reason for LBBB. The increased value of interstitial fibrosis in patients with LBBB may reflect latent diffuse process in myocardium inexorably leading to DCM development.