Abstract 4132291: Assessing the Efficacy of Preventive Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Optimal Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Vulnerable Plaque: A Meta-analysis

Introduction: Rupture and thrombosis of lipid-rich atherosclerotic plaques (vulnerable plaques) contributes to majority of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Current guidelines recommend optimal medical therapy (OMT) for stabilization of vulnerable plaques. Recent evidence of preventive percutaneous intervention (PCI) as a targeted treatment shows improvement in outcomes in these patients. Hypothesis/Goals/Aims: We aim to evaluate the efficacy of preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT) for treatment of non-vulnerable plaque within five years of follow up from available selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, OVID, and NIH Clinical Trials were searched for RCTs evaluating preventive PCI compared to standard of care medical therapy. All trials reported primary common endpoints as death from cardiac cause and myocardial infarction (MI). Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, any revascularization, hospitalization for unstable and progressive angina, and composite death (any cause, MI, or any revascularization). Sub analyses for secondary outcomes were included if measured by RCT. A fixed effect model with Mantel-Haenszel statistical method was used to calculate risk ratios, Z scores, and a 95% confidence interval. Results: Ten RCTs (n=15955 patients) were included. Preventive PCI of vulnerable plaques revealed a significant benefit in lowering incidence of MI (RR: 0.86 [0.77, 0.86], p=0.01) and death from cardiac cause (RR: 0.73 [0.62, 0.86], p=0.004). Similarly, patients undergoing preventive PCI had a lower incidence of hospitalization for unstable or progressive angina (RR: 0.75 [0.62, 0.91], p<0.0001) and composite death (RR: 0.55 [0.46, 0.67], p<0.001). No difference was noted in all-cause mortality. Incidence of revascularization had a significant benefit with OMT therapy compared to preventive PCI (RR: 1.84 [1.75, 1.94], p<0.0001). Conclusion: Preventive PCI in vulnerable plaque demonstrates cardiovascular benefit as a result from lower incidence of MI, death from cardiac cause, composite death and fewer hospitalization for unstable or progressive angina.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4132291
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4132291: Assessing the Efficacy of Preventive Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Optimal Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Vulnerable Plaque: A Meta-analysis

Divya Verma, Kishore J. Harjai, Chaitanya Rojulpote, Chien‐Jung Lin et al.
Circulation
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
article

Abstract 4132291: Assessing the Efficacy of Preventive Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Optimal Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Vulnerable Plaque: A Meta-analysis

Divya Verma, Kishore J. Harjai, Chaitanya Rojulpote, Chien‐Jung Lin, Nicholas Mootz
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Rupture and thrombosis of lipid-rich atherosclerotic plaques (vulnerable plaques) contributes to majority of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Current guidelines recommend optimal medical therapy (OMT) for stabilization of vulnerable plaques. Recent evidence of preventive percutaneous intervention (PCI) as a targeted treatment shows improvement in outcomes in these patients. Hypothesis/Goals/Aims: We aim to evaluate the efficacy of preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT) for treatment of non-vulnerable plaque within five years of follow up from available selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, OVID, and NIH Clinical Trials were searched for RCTs evaluating preventive PCI compared to standard of care medical therapy. All trials reported primary common endpoints as death from cardiac cause and myocardial infarction (MI). Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, any revascularization, hospitalization for unstable and progressive angina, and composite death (any cause, MI, or any revascularization). Sub analyses for secondary outcomes were included if measured by RCT. A fixed effect model with Mantel-Haenszel statistical method was used to calculate risk ratios, Z scores, and a 95% confidence interval. Results: Ten RCTs (n=15955 patients) were included. Preventive PCI of vulnerable plaques revealed a significant benefit in lowering incidence of MI (RR: 0.86 [0.77, 0.86], p=0.01) and death from cardiac cause (RR: 0.73 [0.62, 0.86], p=0.004). Similarly, patients undergoing preventive PCI had a lower incidence of hospitalization for unstable or progressive angina (RR: 0.75 [0.62, 0.91], p<0.0001) and composite death (RR: 0.55 [0.46, 0.67], p<0.001). No difference was noted in all-cause mortality. Incidence of revascularization had a significant benefit with OMT therapy compared to preventive PCI (RR: 1.84 [1.75, 1.94], p<0.0001). Conclusion: Preventive PCI in vulnerable plaque demonstrates cardiovascular benefit as a result from lower incidence of MI, death from cardiac cause, composite death and fewer hospitalization for unstable or progressive angina.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Saint Louis University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.