Abstract 4134685: Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing for Characterization and Prognostication in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) carries substantial risk of adverse cardiac events. Consequently, detailed physiologic assessment and accurate risk stratification in HCM are of high clinical importance. Aim: To synthesize current evidence on the utility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) for characterization and prognostication of HCM. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched for eligible studies from database inception to November 2023. Studies that had at least one CPET performed in HCM patients, with corresponding test data reported, were included. Abstracts with no full-text and studies focused on pediatric populations were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of cardiovascular adverse events. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) from Cox proportional hazard model were meta-analyzed. This study was performed following the PRISMA guidelines and registered under PROSPERO (CRD42023487759). Results: Sixty full-length manuscripts focused on CPETs performed in HCM patients were included, comprising 12,914 patients. Despite male predominance (66%) and average age of 48 years, peak VO 2 was only 6.2 [95% CI, 6.0-6.4] metabolic equivalents (21.8 [20.9-22.6] mL/kg/min), consistent with significant functional limitation. In subanalyses, peak VO 2 was 18.9 [18.0-19.9] mL/kg/min in obstructive HCM and 22.5 [20.8-24.2] mL/kg/min in non-obstructive HCM. Compared to commonly used metrics such as NYHA Class, CPET markedly enhances sensitivity to detect impaired cardiac performance ( Figure ). This meta-analysis highlights several easily-derived CPET variables that consistently predict HCM prognosis. An increase of 1 mL/kg/min in peak VO 2 was associated with a lower HR of 0.83 [0.76-0.90] for adverse cardiac events, while a 1 unit increase in the VE/VCO 2 slope was associated with a higher HR of 1.12 [1.03-1.23]. Abnormal blood pressure response to exercise conferred a 2.5-fold [2.0-3.1] increase in adverse events. Conclusion: CPET is a valuable objective method for multi-dimensional physiologic assessment and prognostication in HCM. With further standardization, CPET is well suited for more widespread clinical utilization in HCM patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4134685
Primary Topic
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4134685: Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing for Characterization and Prognostication in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis

Roberto Barriales‐Villa, Sara Saberi, ANJALI TIKU OWENS, Shaina McGinnis et al.
Circulation
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
article

Abstract 4134685: Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing for Characterization and Prognostication in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis

Roberto Barriales‐Villa, Sara Saberi, ANJALI TIKU OWENS, Shaina McGinnis, Martin S. Maron, Ahmad Masri, Catharine Griskowitz, Isabela Landsteiner, Gregory D. Lewis, Chloe Newlands
article en

Abstract

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) carries substantial risk of adverse cardiac events. Consequently, detailed physiologic assessment and accurate risk stratification in HCM are of high clinical importance. Aim: To synthesize current evidence on the utility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) for characterization and prognostication of HCM. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched for eligible studies from database inception to November 2023. Studies that had at least one CPET performed in HCM patients, with corresponding test data reported, were included. Abstracts with no full-text and studies focused on pediatric populations were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of cardiovascular adverse events. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) from Cox proportional hazard model were meta-analyzed. This study was performed following the PRISMA guidelines and registered under PROSPERO (CRD42023487759). Results: Sixty full-length manuscripts focused on CPETs performed in HCM patients were included, comprising 12,914 patients. Despite male predominance (66%) and average age of 48 years, peak VO 2 was only 6.2 [95% CI, 6.0-6.4] metabolic equivalents (21.8 [20.9-22.6] mL/kg/min), consistent with significant functional limitation. In subanalyses, peak VO 2 was 18.9 [18.0-19.9] mL/kg/min in obstructive HCM and 22.5 [20.8-24.2] mL/kg/min in non-obstructive HCM. Compared to commonly used metrics such as NYHA Class, CPET markedly enhances sensitivity to detect impaired cardiac performance ( Figure ). This meta-analysis highlights several easily-derived CPET variables that consistently predict HCM prognosis. An increase of 1 mL/kg/min in peak VO 2 was associated with a lower HR of 0.83 [0.76-0.90] for adverse cardiac events, while a 1 unit increase in the VE/VCO 2 slope was associated with a higher HR of 1.12 [1.03-1.23]. Abnormal blood pressure response to exercise conferred a 2.5-fold [2.0-3.1] increase in adverse events. Conclusion: CPET is a valuable objective method for multi-dimensional physiologic assessment and prognostication in HCM. With further standardization, CPET is well suited for more widespread clinical utilization in HCM patients.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Oregon Health & Science University (US), University of Michigan (US), University Medical Center (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Lahey Medical Center (US), Michigan United (US), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (ES), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.