Abstract 4137527: Evaluation of 10-Year Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Performance using the PREVENT versus Pooled Cohort Equations in a US Integrated Healthcare System

Background: The American Heart Association published the new PREVENT equations for estimating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Question: Do the PREVENT equations improve risk prediction for 10-year ASCVD compared with the pooled cohort equations (PCEs) in a large diverse population? Aim: To assess ASCVD risk prediction performance of the two PREVENT equations [PREVENT Base, PREVENT Base plus optional predictors including urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, glycated hemoglobin, and social deprivation index (PREVENT Full)] compared with the PCEs. Methods: We included adults aged 40-75 years without a history of ASCVD or diabetes from Kaiser Permanente Southern California in 2009 and followed them through 2019. Outcome was incident ASCVD defined as myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, fatal and nonfatal stroke. We compared model discrimination (Harrell’s C), mean calibration (estimated as the ratio of predicted to observed event rates), and calibration curve among the overall population and stratified by sex and race/ethnicity. Results: Of the 559,111 adults (mean age 54, 11% Black, 32% Hispanic), 10,695 developed an ASCVD event during a median follow-up of 10 years. Harrell’s C among the overall population was 0.741 (95% CI 0.736-0.745) for PREVENT Base, 0.743 (0.738-0.748) for PREVENT Full, and 0.741 (0.736-0.746) for the PCEs ( Table ). Compared with the PCEs, both PREVENT equations improved Harrell’s C in men but not in women, and in Black adults but not in other racial/ethnic groups. Both PREVENT equations were well-calibrated (mean calibration ranged 0.83-1.37; calibration slope ranged 0.71-1.28), while the PCEs overestimated 10-year ASCVD risk (mean calibration ranged 1.80-2.20; calibration slope ranged 0.34-0.45) ( Table & Figure ). Conclusion: Compared with the PCEs, both PREVENT Base and Full equations improved calibration in predicting 10-year ASCVD risk, with minimal improvement in discrimination in men and Black adults only.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4137527
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4137527: Evaluation of 10-Year Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Performance using the PREVENT versus Pooled Cohort Equations in a US Integrated Healthcare System

Norrina B. Allen, Soon Kyu Choi, Monika M. Safford, Kristi Reynolds et al.
1 links
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4137527: Evaluation of 10-Year Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Performance using the PREVENT versus Pooled Cohort Equations in a US Integrated Healthcare System

Norrina B. Allen, Soon Kyu Choi, Monika M. Safford, Kristi Reynolds, Brandon Kyle Bellows, Lisandro D. Colantonio, Jaejin An, Hui Zhou, Yiyi Zhang, Mengnan Zhou, Andrew Moran
article en

Abstract

Background: The American Heart Association published the new PREVENT equations for estimating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Question: Do the PREVENT equations improve risk prediction for 10-year ASCVD compared with the pooled cohort equations (PCEs) in a large diverse population? Aim: To assess ASCVD risk prediction performance of the two PREVENT equations [PREVENT Base, PREVENT Base plus optional predictors including urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, glycated hemoglobin, and social deprivation index (PREVENT Full)] compared with the PCEs. Methods: We included adults aged 40-75 years without a history of ASCVD or diabetes from Kaiser Permanente Southern California in 2009 and followed them through 2019. Outcome was incident ASCVD defined as myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, fatal and nonfatal stroke. We compared model discrimination (Harrell’s C), mean calibration (estimated as the ratio of predicted to observed event rates), and calibration curve among the overall population and stratified by sex and race/ethnicity. Results: Of the 559,111 adults (mean age 54, 11% Black, 32% Hispanic), 10,695 developed an ASCVD event during a median follow-up of 10 years. Harrell’s C among the overall population was 0.741 (95% CI 0.736-0.745) for PREVENT Base, 0.743 (0.738-0.748) for PREVENT Full, and 0.741 (0.736-0.746) for the PCEs ( Table ). Compared with the PCEs, both PREVENT equations improved Harrell’s C in men but not in women, and in Black adults but not in other racial/ethnic groups. Both PREVENT equations were well-calibrated (mean calibration ranged 0.83-1.37; calibration slope ranged 0.71-1.28), while the PCEs overestimated 10-year ASCVD risk (mean calibration ranged 1.80-2.20; calibration slope ranged 0.34-0.45) ( Table & Figure ). Conclusion: Compared with the PCEs, both PREVENT Base and Full equations improved calibration in predicting 10-year ASCVD risk, with minimal improvement in discrimination in men and Black adults only.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Northwestern University (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), Cornell University (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), Columbia University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.