Abstract 4137672: Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes in Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction by Sex

Background: Heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) is a growing clinical entity. While males are more likely to present with HFrEF, there remains little understanding of how sex relates to the epidemiology, predictors, and progression of HFimpEF. Research Question: What are the differences in epidemiology, clinical characteristics, medical management, and outcomes in patients (pts) with HFimpEF based on sex. Methods: We identified adults age ≥18 years with incident HFrEF (EF ≤40%) between January 2013 and December 2018 within Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated health system serving >4.5 million members. HFimpEF was defined as subsequent EF measurement >40% within the following 12 months. Sex was based on self-report. Among pts with HFimpEF, we examined guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) use at time of incident HFimpEF, and at 6- and 12-months post-HFimpEF, stratified by sex. The incidence of worsening HF (WHF) events and all-cause death was assessed in a landmark analysis at 12 months post-HFrEF. We compared event rates between patients with HFimpEF and persistent HFrEF using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for baseline age and EF. Results: Among 12,639 patients with incident HFrEF (female: 36%), 33% experienced HFimpEF. Females were more likely to experience HFimpEF in the 12 months following HFrEF than males (34% vs. 32%, p<0.01). Among pts with HFimpEF, treatment with GDMT was similar among males and females and declined after incident HFimpEF in both sexes (Figure, Panel A). Females had similar rates of WHF or all-cause death compared to males (adjusted [a]HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.26, P=0.17). Compared with those with persistent HFrEF, pts with HFimpEF had lower rates of WHF or all-cause death, a finding which was consistent by sex (male: aHR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.61, female: aHR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.62; Pinteraction by sex=0.78; Figure, Panel B). Conclusions: HFimpEF is more common among females compared to males, but prognosis is similar. Despite similar medical therapy, GDMT discontinuation after EF improvement is prevalent. Improvement in EF is similarly associated with improved outcomes across sex. Further data are needed to elucidate the differential etiologies of HF by sex.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4137672
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4137672: Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes in Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction by Sex

Thida C. Tan, Orly Vardeny, Sirtaz Adatya, Andrew P. Ambrosy et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4137672: Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes in Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction by Sex

Thida C. Tan, Orly Vardeny, Sirtaz Adatya, Andrew P. Ambrosy, Elena Vasti, Ankeet S. Bhatt, Keane Lee, Sahar Naderi, Rishi Parikh, Alexander T. Sandhu, Ivy Ku, Yilin Liang, Steven Hamilton, Alan S. Go, M. Porras
article en

Abstract

Background: Heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) is a growing clinical entity. While males are more likely to present with HFrEF, there remains little understanding of how sex relates to the epidemiology, predictors, and progression of HFimpEF. Research Question: What are the differences in epidemiology, clinical characteristics, medical management, and outcomes in patients (pts) with HFimpEF based on sex. Methods: We identified adults age ≥18 years with incident HFrEF (EF ≤40%) between January 2013 and December 2018 within Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated health system serving >4.5 million members. HFimpEF was defined as subsequent EF measurement >40% within the following 12 months. Sex was based on self-report. Among pts with HFimpEF, we examined guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) use at time of incident HFimpEF, and at 6- and 12-months post-HFimpEF, stratified by sex. The incidence of worsening HF (WHF) events and all-cause death was assessed in a landmark analysis at 12 months post-HFrEF. We compared event rates between patients with HFimpEF and persistent HFrEF using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for baseline age and EF. Results: Among 12,639 patients with incident HFrEF (female: 36%), 33% experienced HFimpEF. Females were more likely to experience HFimpEF in the 12 months following HFrEF than males (34% vs. 32%, p<0.01). Among pts with HFimpEF, treatment with GDMT was similar among males and females and declined after incident HFimpEF in both sexes (Figure, Panel A). Females had similar rates of WHF or all-cause death compared to males (adjusted [a]HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.26, P=0.17). Compared with those with persistent HFrEF, pts with HFimpEF had lower rates of WHF or all-cause death, a finding which was consistent by sex (male: aHR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.61, female: aHR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.62; Pinteraction by sex=0.78; Figure, Panel B). Conclusions: HFimpEF is more common among females compared to males, but prognosis is similar. Despite similar medical therapy, GDMT discontinuation after EF improvement is prevalent. Improvement in EF is similarly associated with improved outcomes across sex. Further data are needed to elucidate the differential etiologies of HF by sex.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US), Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center (US), Stanford University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.