Response of Patients with Color Vision Defects to Worth 4-Dot and Duochrome Tests

<b>Background:</b> Individuals with congenital color vision defects (CVDs) are at greater risk of misidentifying colors, necessitating an investigation into their ability to distinguish colors accurately. This study aimed to assess how individuals with CVDs perceive the colors in the Worth four-dot (W4D) and duochrome tests. It also explored whether individuals with CVDs require more detailed instructions from optometrists and eye care providers during these tests. <b>Method</b>: Thirty-two participants with congenital CVDs were recruited for this study. Participants with ocular diseases were excluded based on a brief questionnaire. The participants underwent a W4D test to determine the colors of four circles and the duochrome test without using filters. <b>Result:</b> All the participants correctly identified the W4D colors, except for five participants (15.62%). Furthermore, among all the participants, two (one with deuteranopia and one with protanopia) failed to identify the colors correctly in the duochrome test (6.25%). <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings suggest that in the context of optometric assessment, it could be essential for optometrists to incorporate a preliminary inquiry into a patient's ability to identify colors prior to performing diagnostic tests such as the W4D or duochrome tests. Incorrect responses from patients with CVDs might mislead optometrists regarding the proper outcomes of the test.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12222262
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response of Patients with Color Vision Defects to Worth 4-Dot and Duochrome Tests

Mohammed Alhazmi, Mosaad Alhassan, Bader Almagren, Meznah Saud Almutairi et al.
1 citations
Healthcare
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
0.34
article

Response of Patients with Color Vision Defects to Worth 4-Dot and Duochrome Tests

Mohammed Alhazmi, Mosaad Alhassan, Bader Almagren, Meznah Saud Almutairi, Muteb Marshad Alanazi, Essam Almutleb, Ali Almustanyir, Balsam Alabdulkader, Tahani M. Alqahtani, Abdulmalik Alhadyani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Individuals with congenital color vision defects (CVDs) are at greater risk of misidentifying colors, necessitating an investigation into their ability to distinguish colors accurately. This study aimed to assess how individuals with CVDs perceive the colors in the Worth four-dot (W4D) and duochrome tests. It also explored whether individuals with CVDs require more detailed instructions from optometrists and eye care providers during these tests. <b>Method</b>: Thirty-two participants with congenital CVDs were recruited for this study. Participants with ocular diseases were excluded based on a brief questionnaire. The participants underwent a W4D test to determine the colors of four circles and the duochrome test without using filters. <b>Result:</b> All the participants correctly identified the W4D colors, except for five participants (15.62%). Furthermore, among all the participants, two (one with deuteranopia and one with protanopia) failed to identify the colors correctly in the duochrome test (6.25%). <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings suggest that in the context of optometric assessment, it could be essential for optometrists to incorporate a preliminary inquiry into a patient's ability to identify colors prior to performing diagnostic tests such as the W4D or duochrome tests. Incorrect responses from patients with CVDs might mislead optometrists regarding the proper outcomes of the test.

HealthcareVol. 12(22)
King Saud University (SA)
King Saud University
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.