A meta-analysis on the effect of technology on the achievement of less advantaged students

This paper presents a meta-analysis that investigates the impact that the educational use of digital technologies has on less advantaged students’ achievement. We use a comprehensive definition for this group of students that includes all students in less developed countries as well as more disadvantaged students in more developed countries. 740 estimates from 72 studies employing experimental and quasi-experimental research designs are collected. Overall, educational technology initiatives are found to have a small, positive, statistically significant effect that remains even after correcting for publication bias. Additionally, our results indicate that computer-assisted learning and behavioural interventions are more effective in raising the achievement of less advantaged students than simple access to technology. Interestingly, the effect of these two interventions appears to be of a similar magnitude. Finally, the use of digital technologies is associated with slightly greater achievements in math and science than humanities. • We conducted a meta-analysis on the achievement-enhancing effects of ed-tech. • We focused our attention on less advantaged students. • Ours is the first meta-analysis using a broad definition for this group of students. • Ed-tech has a moderate impact on the performance of less advantaged students. • CAL and behavioural initiatives can be especially effective in raising achievement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computers & Education
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105197
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Gender and Technology in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A meta-analysis on the effect of technology on the achievement of less advantaged students

Jonatan Castaño‐Muñoz, Giorgio Di Pietro
16 citations
Computers & Education
Gender and Technology in Education
14.87
article

A meta-analysis on the effect of technology on the achievement of less advantaged students

Jonatan Castaño‐Muñoz, Giorgio Di Pietro
article en
16 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a meta-analysis that investigates the impact that the educational use of digital technologies has on less advantaged students’ achievement. We use a comprehensive definition for this group of students that includes all students in less developed countries as well as more disadvantaged students in more developed countries. 740 estimates from 72 studies employing experimental and quasi-experimental research designs are collected. Overall, educational technology initiatives are found to have a small, positive, statistically significant effect that remains even after correcting for publication bias. Additionally, our results indicate that computer-assisted learning and behavioural interventions are more effective in raising the achievement of less advantaged students than simple access to technology. Interestingly, the effect of these two interventions appears to be of a similar magnitude. Finally, the use of digital technologies is associated with slightly greater achievements in math and science than humanities. • We conducted a meta-analysis on the achievement-enhancing effects of ed-tech. • We focused our attention on less advantaged students. • Ours is the first meta-analysis using a broad definition for this group of students. • Ed-tech has a moderate impact on the performance of less advantaged students. • CAL and behavioural initiatives can be especially effective in raising achievement.

Computers & EducationVol. 226
Universidad de Sevilla, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Joint Research Centre, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, European Social Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Gender and Technology in Education
14.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.