The Adsorption of Arsenate and Arsenite Ions on Oxidic Substrates Prepared with a Variable-Charge Lithological Material

The adsorption of As(V) and As(III) (0.01-1 mM) on a calcined oxidic lithologic material substrate with pH-dependent surface variable charges, chemically modifiable, was investigated. The substrate was prepared via thermal treatment using a natural lithologic material rich in amphoteric oxides of Fe, Al, Mn and Ti. The calcined substrate was treated with acid media (HCl 0.1) to homogenize the positive charge density on the oxide surface via oxide protonation so that anion adsorption would be favored. A batch experiment was performed on the acid-treated substrate (activated) and non-activated substrate. L-type isotherms were obtained, which fit the Freundlich model. Isotherm constants showed that there was a greater affinity between the activated substrate and As(V) (<i>K</i> = 10.58) compared to As(III) (<i>K</i> = 5.45). The adsorption capacity of the activated substrate was two times greater than that of the non-activated substrate, As(V) (<i>K<sub>act</sub></i> = 10.58 and <i>K<sub>noact</sub></i> = 5.45) vs. As(III) (<i>K<sub>act</sub></i> = 5.45 y <i>K<sub>noact</sub></i> = 2.44), which was due to the greater positive charge density on the activated surface, created by the protonation of the surface oxides. Protons were liberated during the adsorption reaction (As(V): 2.17 × 10<sup>-3</sup> and As(III): 0.96 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mmol/mL). The forms H<sub>2</sub>AsO<sub>4</sub><sup>-</sup> and H<sub>3</sub>AsO<sub>3</sub> deprotonated when adsorbed by the surface groups M-OH2+ (M: Fe, Al). Kinetic data showed a second-order process for As(V) adsorption and a first-order process for As(III) adsorption. The adsorption rate on the activated substrate was two times greater compared with the non-activated substrate: As(V) (<i>k<sub>act</sub></i> = 3.78 × 10<sup>-5</sup> L/mg·min and <i>k<sub>noact</sub></i> = 2.16 × 10<sup>-5</sup> L/mg·min) vs. As(III) (<i>k<sub>act</sub></i> = 0.055 h<sup>-1</sup> and <i>k<sub>noact</sub></i> = 0.027 h<sup>-1</sup>). The tested substrate is potentially useful as a low-cost natural material for arsenic removal from contaminated water.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17225544
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Adsorption of Arsenate and Arsenite Ions on Oxidic Substrates Prepared with a Variable-Charge Lithological Material

Enju Wang, Fernando Millán, Xinyao Ren, Guido Patricio Santillán Lima et al.
2 citations
Materials
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
0.50
article

The Adsorption of Arsenate and Arsenite Ions on Oxidic Substrates Prepared with a Variable-Charge Lithological Material

Enju Wang, Fernando Millán, Xinyao Ren, Guido Patricio Santillán Lima, Andrés Márquez, Marin Șenilă, José G. Prato, L. González, Carla Silva Padilla
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The adsorption of As(V) and As(III) (0.01-1 mM) on a calcined oxidic lithologic material substrate with pH-dependent surface variable charges, chemically modifiable, was investigated. The substrate was prepared via thermal treatment using a natural lithologic material rich in amphoteric oxides of Fe, Al, Mn and Ti. The calcined substrate was treated with acid media (HCl 0.1) to homogenize the positive charge density on the oxide surface via oxide protonation so that anion adsorption would be favored. A batch experiment was performed on the acid-treated substrate (activated) and non-activated substrate. L-type isotherms were obtained, which fit the Freundlich model. Isotherm constants showed that there was a greater affinity between the activated substrate and As(V) (<i>K</i> = 10.58) compared to As(III) (<i>K</i> = 5.45). The adsorption capacity of the activated substrate was two times greater than that of the non-activated substrate, As(V) (<i>K<sub>act</sub></i> = 10.58 and <i>K<sub>noact</sub></i> = 5.45) vs. As(III) (<i>K<sub>act</sub></i> = 5.45 y <i>K<sub>noact</sub></i> = 2.44), which was due to the greater positive charge density on the activated surface, created by the protonation of the surface oxides. Protons were liberated during the adsorption reaction (As(V): 2.17 × 10<sup>-3</sup> and As(III): 0.96 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mmol/mL). The forms H<sub>2</sub>AsO<sub>4</sub><sup>-</sup> and H<sub>3</sub>AsO<sub>3</sub> deprotonated when adsorbed by the surface groups M-OH2+ (M: Fe, Al). Kinetic data showed a second-order process for As(V) adsorption and a first-order process for As(III) adsorption. The adsorption rate on the activated substrate was two times greater compared with the non-activated substrate: As(V) (<i>k<sub>act</sub></i> = 3.78 × 10<sup>-5</sup> L/mg·min and <i>k<sub>noact</sub></i> = 2.16 × 10<sup>-5</sup> L/mg·min) vs. As(III) (<i>k<sub>act</sub></i> = 0.055 h<sup>-1</sup> and <i>k<sub>noact</sub></i> = 0.027 h<sup>-1</sup>). The tested substrate is potentially useful as a low-cost natural material for arsenic removal from contaminated water.

MaterialsVol. 17(22)
St. John's University (US), Universidad de Los Andes (VE), Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation (RO), Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo (EC)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.