NitroNet – a machine learning model for the prediction of tropospheric NO <sub>2</sub> profiles from TROPOMI observations

Abstract. We introduce NitroNet, a deep learning model for the prediction of tropospheric NO2 profiles from satellite column measurements. NitroNet is a neural network trained on synthetic NO2 profiles from the regional chemistry and transport model WRF-Chem, which was operated on a European domain for the month of May 2019. This WRF-Chem simulation was constrained by in situ and satellite measurements, which were used to optimize important simulation parameters (e.g. the boundary layer scheme). The NitroNet model receives NO2 vertical column densities (VCDs) from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) and ancillary variables (meteorology, emissions, etc.) as input, from which it reproduces NO2 concentration profiles. Training of the neural network is conducted on a filtered dataset, meaning that NO2 profiles showing strong disagreement (&gt;20 %) with colocated TROPOMI column measurements are discarded. We present a first evaluation of NitroNet over a variety of geographical and temporal domains (Europe, the US West Coast, India, and China) and different seasons. For this purpose, we validate the NO2 profiles predicted by NitroNet against satellite, in situ, and MAX-DOAS (Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) measurements. The training data were previously validated against the same datasets. During summertime, NitroNet shows small biases and strong correlations with all three datasets: a bias of +6.7 % and R=0.95 for TROPOMI NO2 VCDs, a bias of −10.5 % and R=0.75 for AirBase surface concentrations, and a bias of −34.3 % to +99.6 % with R=0.83–0.99 for MAX-DOAS measurements. In comparison to TROPOMI satellite data, NitroNet even shows significantly lower errors and stronger correlation than a direct comparison with WRF-Chem numerical results. During wintertime considerable low biases arise because the summertime/late-spring training data are not fully representative of all atmospheric wintertime characteristics (e.g. longer NO2 lifetimes). Nonetheless, the wintertime performance of NitroNet is surprisingly good and comparable to that of classic regional chemistry and transport models. NitroNet can demonstrably be used outside the geographic and temporal domain of the training data with only slight performance reductions. What makes NitroNet unique when compared to similar existing deep learning models is the inclusion of synthetic model data, which offers important benefits: due to the lack of NO2 profile measurements, models trained on empirical datasets are limited to the prediction of surface concentrations learned from in situ measurements. NitroNet, however, can predict full tropospheric NO2 profiles. Furthermore, in situ measurements of NO2 are known to suffer from biases, often larger than +20 %, due to cross-sensitivities to photooxidants, which other models trained on empirical data inevitably reproduce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6485-2024
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NitroNet – a machine learning model for the prediction of tropospheric NO 2 profiles from TROPOMI observations

Thomas Wagner, Sergey Osipov, Leon Kuhn, Andrea Pozzer et al.
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
article

NitroNet – a machine learning model for the prediction of tropospheric NO 2 profiles from TROPOMI observations

Thomas Wagner, Sergey Osipov, Leon Kuhn, Andrea Pozzer, Steffen Beirle
article en

Abstract

Abstract. We introduce NitroNet, a deep learning model for the prediction of tropospheric NO2 profiles from satellite column measurements. NitroNet is a neural network trained on synthetic NO2 profiles from the regional chemistry and transport model WRF-Chem, which was operated on a European domain for the month of May 2019. This WRF-Chem simulation was constrained by in situ and satellite measurements, which were used to optimize important simulation parameters (e.g. the boundary layer scheme). The NitroNet model receives NO2 vertical column densities (VCDs) from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) and ancillary variables (meteorology, emissions, etc.) as input, from which it reproduces NO2 concentration profiles. Training of the neural network is conducted on a filtered dataset, meaning that NO2 profiles showing strong disagreement (&gt;20 %) with colocated TROPOMI column measurements are discarded. We present a first evaluation of NitroNet over a variety of geographical and temporal domains (Europe, the US West Coast, India, and China) and different seasons. For this purpose, we validate the NO2 profiles predicted by NitroNet against satellite, in situ, and MAX-DOAS (Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) measurements. The training data were previously validated against the same datasets. During summertime, NitroNet shows small biases and strong correlations with all three datasets: a bias of +6.7 % and R=0.95 for TROPOMI NO2 VCDs, a bias of −10.5 % and R=0.75 for AirBase surface concentrations, and a bias of −34.3 % to +99.6 % with R=0.83–0.99 for MAX-DOAS measurements. In comparison to TROPOMI satellite data, NitroNet even shows significantly lower errors and stronger correlation than a direct comparison with WRF-Chem numerical results. During wintertime considerable low biases arise because the summertime/late-spring training data are not fully representative of all atmospheric wintertime characteristics (e.g. longer NO2 lifetimes). Nonetheless, the wintertime performance of NitroNet is surprisingly good and comparable to that of classic regional chemistry and transport models. NitroNet can demonstrably be used outside the geographic and temporal domain of the training data with only slight performance reductions. What makes NitroNet unique when compared to similar existing deep learning models is the inclusion of synthetic model data, which offers important benefits: due to the lack of NO2 profile measurements, models trained on empirical datasets are limited to the prediction of surface concentrations learned from in situ measurements. NitroNet, however, can predict full tropospheric NO2 profiles. Furthermore, in situ measurements of NO2 are known to suffer from biases, often larger than +20 %, due to cross-sensitivities to photooxidants, which other models trained on empirical data inevitably reproduce.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 17(21)
Heidelberg University (DE), Max Planck Institute for Chemistry (DE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.