Decolonial Critical Bioethics and Access to Treatment for Hemophilia in the Americas

Over the past two decades, the integration of sociology with the analytical and normative practices of bioethics has become firmly established. This integration has given rise to two similar yet distinct conceptions of bioethics: empirical bioethics, which utilizes social sciences to enhance ethical scrutiny, and critical bioethics, which not only employs research methods but also draws from established social theories. Critical bioethics aims to overcome the decontextualized analyses inherent in the concept of applied ethics, which relies solely on moral philosophy. This epistemic deepening enables a comprehensible evaluation of the impacts of biotechnologies’ production and distribution within their social and global contexts, ultimately leading to more robust normative frameworks. This article presents the conceptual framework of a model of critical bioethics that we term “decolonial”, developed through the synthesis of the Frankfurt School and decolonial studies. To illustrate the relevance of its analytical parameters, we will examine to clotting factor concentrates in countries across the Americas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista latinoamericana de bioética
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18359/rlbi.6433
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decolonial Critical Bioethics and Access to Treatment for Hemophilia in the Americas

Max Sarmet, Mariana Sayago, Thiago Rocha da Cunha, Cláudio Lorenzo
2 citations
Revista latinoamericana de bioética
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
0.65
article

Decolonial Critical Bioethics and Access to Treatment for Hemophilia in the Americas

Max Sarmet, Mariana Sayago, Thiago Rocha da Cunha, Cláudio Lorenzo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the integration of sociology with the analytical and normative practices of bioethics has become firmly established. This integration has given rise to two similar yet distinct conceptions of bioethics: empirical bioethics, which utilizes social sciences to enhance ethical scrutiny, and critical bioethics, which not only employs research methods but also draws from established social theories. Critical bioethics aims to overcome the decontextualized analyses inherent in the concept of applied ethics, which relies solely on moral philosophy. This epistemic deepening enables a comprehensible evaluation of the impacts of biotechnologies’ production and distribution within their social and global contexts, ultimately leading to more robust normative frameworks. This article presents the conceptual framework of a model of critical bioethics that we term “decolonial”, developed through the synthesis of the Frankfurt School and decolonial studies. To illustrate the relevance of its analytical parameters, we will examine to clotting factor concentrates in countries across the Americas.

Revista latinoamericana de bioéticaVol. 24(2)
Universidade de Brasília (BR), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.