Exploring Recognition in Digital Education through Open Badges and the European Learning Model

Recognition in education is key as it validates and acknowledges achievements, be it of academic or employer qualifications in a formal setting or informally from peers and self-assessment. Educational institutions need to define a strategy for recognition, preferably using a well-known format. Although there are various models, it is difficult to find comparisons among them to help define this strategy in an informed manner. Currently, some of the most commonly used models for recognition are Open Badges (versions 2.0 and 3.0), and the European Learning Model version 3 (ELMv3). Open Badges 3.0 and ELMv3 are aligned with W3C Verifiable Credentials data model (VC). In this complex context, it is important to know the differences among the formats, the advantages and disadvantages of each of them, as well as the scenarios in which their uses may be most appropriate. This article analyzes these models in depth, comparing them using a cross-curricular program for undergraduate students as a case study. The analysis reveals that while Open Badges 3.0 offers greater flexibility, ELMv3 provides a more detailed structure suited to European educational contexts. These findings support educational institutions in selecting the most appropriate recognition strategy tailored to their needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/democon63027.2024.10748225
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Open Education and E-Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Recognition in Digital Education through Open Badges and the European Learning Model

Carlos Alario‐Hoyos, Carlos Delgado Kloos, Rebiha Kemcha
2 citations
Open Education and E-Learning
0.82
article

Exploring Recognition in Digital Education through Open Badges and the European Learning Model

Carlos Alario‐Hoyos, Carlos Delgado Kloos, Rebiha Kemcha
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Recognition in education is key as it validates and acknowledges achievements, be it of academic or employer qualifications in a formal setting or informally from peers and self-assessment. Educational institutions need to define a strategy for recognition, preferably using a well-known format. Although there are various models, it is difficult to find comparisons among them to help define this strategy in an informed manner. Currently, some of the most commonly used models for recognition are Open Badges (versions 2.0 and 3.0), and the European Learning Model version 3 (ELMv3). Open Badges 3.0 and ELMv3 are aligned with W3C Verifiable Credentials data model (VC). In this complex context, it is important to know the differences among the formats, the advantages and disadvantages of each of them, as well as the scenarios in which their uses may be most appropriate. This article analyzes these models in depth, comparing them using a cross-curricular program for undergraduate students as a case study. The analysis reveals that while Open Badges 3.0 offers greater flexibility, ELMv3 provides a more detailed structure suited to European educational contexts. These findings support educational institutions in selecting the most appropriate recognition strategy tailored to their needs.

Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
OCAS
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Open Education and E-Learning
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring Recognition in Digital Education through Open Badges and the European Learning Model — Carlos Alario‐Hoyos, Carlos Delgado Kloos, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS