The effect of temporal masking on alarm call communication in wild superb fairy-wrens

Noise from human activity is a global concern that threatens wildlife, including by disrupting acoustic communication. This disruption appears predominantly caused by masking, where noise makes it difficult to hear acoustic signals. Previous studies have found a strong masking effect when noise and signals occur simultaneously. However, noise can also have a temporal masking effect, meaning that the signal is not detected even if noise occurs before or after the signal (forward and backward masking, respectively). As background noise is often intermittent, temporal masking by natural sounds and anthropogenic noise could pose a significant challenge for animal communication. Surprisingly, although commonly found in humans, temporal masking has been rarely studied in other species. To investigate whether temporal masking affects bird communication in the wild, we conducted a playback experiment on superb fairy-wrens, Malurus cyaneus , using single-element alarm calls before, during and after filtered white noise, as well as a control playback of alarm calls alone. We found that fairy-wrens stopped responding to alarm calls during noise, showing simultaneous masking, but were equally likely to flee if there was noise immediately before or after an alarm call as when there was no noise, suggesting a lack of temporal masking. However, among those fairy-wrens that fled, there was a 20 ms delay in the response to alarm calls after the noise, possibly because of subtle forward masking that delayed call reception. We conclude that temporal masking is unlikely to stop fairy-wrens’ fleeing to alarm calls but might slightly delay call reception. We urge further studies of temporal masking in other species, using various sources of natural and anthropogenic noise, as only then will we know whether temporal masking is of general significance in compromising animal communication. • We test for temporal masking in a wild bird species, the superb fairy-wren. • Temporal masking means that signals occurring before or after noise are masked. • Temporal masking did not affect the proportion of birds fleeing in response to alarm calls. • We urge further study of temporal masking on nonhuman animals in the wild.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Behaviour
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.10.010
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of temporal masking on alarm call communication in wild superb fairy-wrens

You Zhou, Robert D. Magrath, Andrew N. Radford
1 citations
Animal Behaviour
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
0.51
article

The effect of temporal masking on alarm call communication in wild superb fairy-wrens

You Zhou, Robert D. Magrath, Andrew N. Radford
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Noise from human activity is a global concern that threatens wildlife, including by disrupting acoustic communication. This disruption appears predominantly caused by masking, where noise makes it difficult to hear acoustic signals. Previous studies have found a strong masking effect when noise and signals occur simultaneously. However, noise can also have a temporal masking effect, meaning that the signal is not detected even if noise occurs before or after the signal (forward and backward masking, respectively). As background noise is often intermittent, temporal masking by natural sounds and anthropogenic noise could pose a significant challenge for animal communication. Surprisingly, although commonly found in humans, temporal masking has been rarely studied in other species. To investigate whether temporal masking affects bird communication in the wild, we conducted a playback experiment on superb fairy-wrens, Malurus cyaneus , using single-element alarm calls before, during and after filtered white noise, as well as a control playback of alarm calls alone. We found that fairy-wrens stopped responding to alarm calls during noise, showing simultaneous masking, but were equally likely to flee if there was noise immediately before or after an alarm call as when there was no noise, suggesting a lack of temporal masking. However, among those fairy-wrens that fled, there was a 20 ms delay in the response to alarm calls after the noise, possibly because of subtle forward masking that delayed call reception. We conclude that temporal masking is unlikely to stop fairy-wrens’ fleeing to alarm calls but might slightly delay call reception. We urge further studies of temporal masking in other species, using various sources of natural and anthropogenic noise, as only then will we know whether temporal masking is of general significance in compromising animal communication. • We test for temporal masking in a wild bird species, the superb fairy-wren. • Temporal masking means that signals occurring before or after noise are masked. • Temporal masking did not affect the proportion of birds fleeing in response to alarm calls. • We urge further study of temporal masking on nonhuman animals in the wild.

Animal BehaviourVol. 219
Australian National University (AU), University of Bristol (GB)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
0.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.