Anti-AI camouflage

Following the current Russian invasion of Ukraine, the use of AI-enabled technologies is the next logical step in the use of autonomous systems (such as UAVs or loitering munitions) for detecting military assets. The survivability of military assets on the battlefield is increased by Camouflage, Concealment & Deception (CCD) measures. However, current CCD measures are inadequate to prevent detection by AI-enabled technologies. To improve on CCD measures, adversarial patterns can be employed to fool AI for object detection: Assets, such as soldiers, command tents, and vehicles, camouflaged with adversarial patterns are either not detected or are misclassified by AI. In an operational setting, the downside of adversarial patterns is that they are colorful and distinct from their surroundings. This makes them easily detectable by the human eye. In this manuscript, we design anti-AI camouflage that only use colors close to camouflage netting, as commonly used by NATO forces. We show these are effective at (a) either preventing detection, (b) reducing the confidence the AI has in its detection (c) or making the AI detect many false objects with low confidence. This anti-AI camouflage can fool both human intelligence and artificial intelligence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3031144
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anti-AI camouflage

Alexander M. van Oers, Jorik T. Venema
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Anti-AI camouflage

Alexander M. van Oers, Jorik T. Venema
article en

Abstract

Following the current Russian invasion of Ukraine, the use of AI-enabled technologies is the next logical step in the use of autonomous systems (such as UAVs or loitering munitions) for detecting military assets. The survivability of military assets on the battlefield is increased by Camouflage, Concealment & Deception (CCD) measures. However, current CCD measures are inadequate to prevent detection by AI-enabled technologies. To improve on CCD measures, adversarial patterns can be employed to fool AI for object detection: Assets, such as soldiers, command tents, and vehicles, camouflaged with adversarial patterns are either not detected or are misclassified by AI. In an operational setting, the downside of adversarial patterns is that they are colorful and distinct from their surroundings. This makes them easily detectable by the human eye. In this manuscript, we design anti-AI camouflage that only use colors close to camouflage netting, as commonly used by NATO forces. We show these are effective at (a) either preventing detection, (b) reducing the confidence the AI has in its detection (c) or making the AI detect many false objects with low confidence. This anti-AI camouflage can fool both human intelligence and artificial intelligence.

Netherlands Defence Academy (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Anti-AI camouflage — Alexander M. van Oers, Jorik T. Venema · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS