Gender Inclusivity: Exploring Design Dynamics and Psychological Safety in Virtual Engineering Design Dyads

Abstract Despite increasing efforts to promote diversity and women’s inclusion in STEM, women’s participation in engineering remains low, with many leaving the field due to negative experiences in academia and the workplace. As a first step towards understanding this discrepancy, we investigated how gender and gender composition within expert engineering design dyads affect the design interactions, team dynamics, and perceived psychological safety in a virtual collaborative environment. Through statistical, stochastic, and network analyses, distinct gender-based patterns was found in design interactions and communication. Our findings indicated that mixed-gender dyads exhibited more action-oriented behavior. Discrepancies were found in perceived psychological safety between male and female participants and interactions that influenced it. Significant differences were found in self and partner perceptions of contribution, especially regarding design decisions. This study highlights the impact of gender dynamics on collaboration and psychological safety in engineering design, emphasizing the need for more gender-based analysis to foster environments that enhance innovation and creativity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2024-143885
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Inclusivity: Exploring Design Dynamics and Psychological Safety in Virtual Engineering Design Dyads

Debrina Roy, Jessica Menold, Aliaa Maar
Design Education and Practice
article

Gender Inclusivity: Exploring Design Dynamics and Psychological Safety in Virtual Engineering Design Dyads

Debrina Roy, Jessica Menold, Aliaa Maar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite increasing efforts to promote diversity and women’s inclusion in STEM, women’s participation in engineering remains low, with many leaving the field due to negative experiences in academia and the workplace. As a first step towards understanding this discrepancy, we investigated how gender and gender composition within expert engineering design dyads affect the design interactions, team dynamics, and perceived psychological safety in a virtual collaborative environment. Through statistical, stochastic, and network analyses, distinct gender-based patterns was found in design interactions and communication. Our findings indicated that mixed-gender dyads exhibited more action-oriented behavior. Discrepancies were found in perceived psychological safety between male and female participants and interactions that influenced it. Significant differences were found in self and partner perceptions of contribution, especially regarding design decisions. This study highlights the impact of gender dynamics on collaboration and psychological safety in engineering design, emphasizing the need for more gender-based analysis to foster environments that enhance innovation and creativity.

Pennsylvania State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gender Inclusivity: Exploring Design Dynamics and Psychological Safety in Virtual Engineering Design Dyads — Debrina Roy, Jessica Menold, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS