Barriers to Product Repair: Exploring Motivations and Capabilities Among Operators

Abstract This study explores barriers to product repair from the perspective of common ‘do-it-yourself’ users and commercial operators. Through a systematic literature review, we identify and compare repair barriers faced by different operators. Our findings highlight that operators predominantly struggle with limited capability (e.g., lack of skills, tools, spare parts) and motivation (e.g., economic motivation and environmental motivation) to repair. In comparison, commercial operators show greater capability than common users but struggle with the economic motivation of repair due to the necessity of financially compensating their labor. In contrast, common users exhibit a lower capability but benefit from additional motivating factors, such as reduced labor costs and product attachment. A subsequent case study illustrates how these barriers manifest within the repair procedure of an exemplary product. Further, we show how the varying capability and motivation among operators constrain the range of viable repair strategies. Navigating this interplay between repair operator and repair viability holds the potential to assess and enable targeted repair strategies for a diverse range of operators, thereby promoting product repairability and circularity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2024-143714
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to Product Repair: Exploring Motivations and Capabilities Among Operators

Kevin Otto, Katja Hölttä‐Otto, Amy M. Bilton, Wen Li et al.
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
article

Barriers to Product Repair: Exploring Motivations and Capabilities Among Operators

Kevin Otto, Katja Hölttä‐Otto, Amy M. Bilton, Wen Li, Sami Karsli
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study explores barriers to product repair from the perspective of common ‘do-it-yourself’ users and commercial operators. Through a systematic literature review, we identify and compare repair barriers faced by different operators. Our findings highlight that operators predominantly struggle with limited capability (e.g., lack of skills, tools, spare parts) and motivation (e.g., economic motivation and environmental motivation) to repair. In comparison, commercial operators show greater capability than common users but struggle with the economic motivation of repair due to the necessity of financially compensating their labor. In contrast, common users exhibit a lower capability but benefit from additional motivating factors, such as reduced labor costs and product attachment. A subsequent case study illustrates how these barriers manifest within the repair procedure of an exemplary product. Further, we show how the varying capability and motivation among operators constrain the range of viable repair strategies. Navigating this interplay between repair operator and repair viability holds the potential to assess and enable targeted repair strategies for a diverse range of operators, thereby promoting product repairability and circularity.

The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Toronto (CA)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.