Authoritarian Surveillance and Public Support for Digital Governance Solutions

This study investigates factors influencing support for digital governance solutions and compares this support between autocracies and democracies. We conduct survey experiments in Russia, Germany, Turkey, the United States, and Estonia, and find that awareness of potential misuse of digital governance tools by the government reduces support. Importantly, while this effect has previously been documented for China, we find it irrespective of regime type for an autocracy, a hybrid regime and three democracies. Individuals relying on government-controlled information sources are more likely to endorse digital governance tools. Our study challenges prior findings by indicating that gaps in public service quality do not boost support. Instead, satisfaction with government services correlates with trust in the government’s capacity to implement digital governance solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Political Studies
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140241290208
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Authoritarian Surveillance and Public Support for Digital Governance Solutions

Michael Rochlitz, David F. Karpa
3 citations
Comparative Political Studies
Media Influence and Politics
3.40
article

Authoritarian Surveillance and Public Support for Digital Governance Solutions

Michael Rochlitz, David F. Karpa
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study investigates factors influencing support for digital governance solutions and compares this support between autocracies and democracies. We conduct survey experiments in Russia, Germany, Turkey, the United States, and Estonia, and find that awareness of potential misuse of digital governance tools by the government reduces support. Importantly, while this effect has previously been documented for China, we find it irrespective of regime type for an autocracy, a hybrid regime and three democracies. Individuals relying on government-controlled information sources are more likely to endorse digital governance tools. Our study challenges prior findings by indicating that gaps in public service quality do not boost support. Instead, satisfaction with government services correlates with trust in the government’s capacity to implement digital governance solutions.

Comparative Political StudiesVol. 58(10)
University of Bremen (DE), University of Oxford (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Media Influence and Politics
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Authoritarian Surveillance and Public Support for Digital Governance Solutions — Michael Rochlitz, David F. Karpa · Comparative Political Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS