De-Med—a tool to identify and classify potentially inappropriate medication according to Beers criteria, STOPP, and FORTA: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Objective A significant number of older adults are affected by the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), leading to various adverse outcomes, such as increased physical and cognitive impairment, frailty, hospitalization, and mortality. The objective of this study was to develop and test the reliability and feasibility of the De-Med tool. Methods This tool was developed using ReactJS for data extraction and manipulation. Users can upload drug lists for analysis, and the software delineates PIMs adhering to the Beers 2019 version, Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) Version 2, and Fit fOR The Aged (FORTA) 2021 criteria. Reliability was assessed by juxtaposing software-generated outputs with manual assessments conducted by independent research pharmacists using retrospective medication records. The System Usability Scale (SUS) and AttrakDiff Mini questionnaires were used to assess feasibility and usability, respectively. Key findings Manual and software-generated PIM identifications agreed completely, demonstrating high reliability (100% concordance). A total of 1496 PIMs were identified from 231 records, with an average of 0.63 encounters per patient. The overall usability score was 83.75, indicating “Excellent.” According to the AttrakDiff ratings, users attributed the software to both pragmatic (mean PQ:1.84) and hedonic (mean HQ:1.50) qualities, with moderate overall attractiveness (mean ATT:2.13). Conclusions This web-based tool successfully identified PIMs with perfect reliability, high usability, and a moderate level of attractiveness. This tool has the potential to improve medication management in older adults by reducing PIMs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmae026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De-Med—a tool to identify and classify potentially inappropriate medication according to Beers criteria, STOPP, and FORTA: a cross-sectional study

Madhan Ramesh, Prathiba Pereira, Vikram Patil, Jehath Syed et al.
1 citations
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
0.34
article

De-Med—a tool to identify and classify potentially inappropriate medication according to Beers criteria, STOPP, and FORTA: a cross-sectional study

Madhan Ramesh, Prathiba Pereira, Vikram Patil, Jehath Syed, Vineet Chopra, AK Verma, Sri Harsha Chalasani, Vineeta Khemchandani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective A significant number of older adults are affected by the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), leading to various adverse outcomes, such as increased physical and cognitive impairment, frailty, hospitalization, and mortality. The objective of this study was to develop and test the reliability and feasibility of the De-Med tool. Methods This tool was developed using ReactJS for data extraction and manipulation. Users can upload drug lists for analysis, and the software delineates PIMs adhering to the Beers 2019 version, Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) Version 2, and Fit fOR The Aged (FORTA) 2021 criteria. Reliability was assessed by juxtaposing software-generated outputs with manual assessments conducted by independent research pharmacists using retrospective medication records. The System Usability Scale (SUS) and AttrakDiff Mini questionnaires were used to assess feasibility and usability, respectively. Key findings Manual and software-generated PIM identifications agreed completely, demonstrating high reliability (100% concordance). A total of 1496 PIMs were identified from 231 records, with an average of 0.63 encounters per patient. The overall usability score was 83.75, indicating “Excellent.” According to the AttrakDiff ratings, users attributed the software to both pragmatic (mean PQ:1.84) and hedonic (mean HQ:1.50) qualities, with moderate overall attractiveness (mean ATT:2.13). Conclusions This web-based tool successfully identified PIMs with perfect reliability, high usability, and a moderate level of attractiveness. This tool has the potential to improve medication management in older adults by reducing PIMs.

Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services ResearchVol. 15(4)
JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research (IN), Institute of Technical Education (SG), JSS Medical College and Hospital (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.