The discontinuation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock therapies towards the end of life: consensus guideline from the British Heart Rhythm Society

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are implanted in increasing numbers of patients with the aim of treating ventricular arrhythmias in high-risk patients and reducing their risk of dying. Individuals are also living longer with these devices. As a result, a greater number of patients with an ICD will deteriorate either with worsening cardiac failure, another non-cardiac condition or general frailty and will have a limited prognosis. Frequently, they will be cared for by non-cardiac teams who may be less familiar with ICDs. Therefore, to ensure the person receives high-quality end-of-life care, they should have the opportunity to consider and discuss the option to deactivate the shock function of their ICD. If the ICD shock therapy is not discontinued, there is an increased risk that, as a person reaches the last days of life, the ICD may deliver multiple, painful shocks that are distressing. There is also a risk that the device may delay the person's natural death, which the person would not have chosen if they had been given the opportunity to discuss discontinuation. The British Heart Rhythm Society has developed a practical guideline to support all healthcare professionals who are caring for patients who have an ICD. This includes descriptions of different device types, ethical and legal aspects, timing and nature of ICD discussions and practical advice regarding how the devices may be deactivated. It aims to promote awareness and timely discussion between professionals and patients and to encourage best practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae246
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The discontinuation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock therapies towards the end of life: consensus guideline from the British Heart Rhythm Society

Amy Dutton, Paul Foley, Miriam J. Johnson, Henry R. Herbert et al.
1 citations
Age and Ageing
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
0.40
article

The discontinuation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock therapies towards the end of life: consensus guideline from the British Heart Rhythm Society

Amy Dutton, Paul Foley, Miriam J. Johnson, Henry R. Herbert, Honey Thomas, Jane Wallace
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are implanted in increasing numbers of patients with the aim of treating ventricular arrhythmias in high-risk patients and reducing their risk of dying. Individuals are also living longer with these devices. As a result, a greater number of patients with an ICD will deteriorate either with worsening cardiac failure, another non-cardiac condition or general frailty and will have a limited prognosis. Frequently, they will be cared for by non-cardiac teams who may be less familiar with ICDs. Therefore, to ensure the person receives high-quality end-of-life care, they should have the opportunity to consider and discuss the option to deactivate the shock function of their ICD. If the ICD shock therapy is not discontinued, there is an increased risk that, as a person reaches the last days of life, the ICD may deliver multiple, painful shocks that are distressing. There is also a risk that the device may delay the person's natural death, which the person would not have chosen if they had been given the opportunity to discuss discontinuation. The British Heart Rhythm Society has developed a practical guideline to support all healthcare professionals who are caring for patients who have an ICD. This includes descriptions of different device types, ethical and legal aspects, timing and nature of ICD discussions and practical advice regarding how the devices may be deactivated. It aims to promote awareness and timely discussion between professionals and patients and to encourage best practice.

Age and AgeingVol. 53(11)
University of Hull (GB), Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital (GB), Great Western Hospital (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Wythenshawe Hospital (GB), Hull York Medical School (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.