How does government <i>feel?</i> Toward a theory of institutional pathos in public administration

Abstract In the study of policy and administration, emotions are largely conceived as an exogenous factor that impacts on institutions and processes. Still ignored are the emotions felt and performed not just individually by civil servants, but collectively within government organizations. This article turns to insights on emotions from organizational studies to offer a conceptual framework through which to understand the lifeworld of government, or “institutional pathos.” It then applies this framework to an extreme case: Whitehall's response to the Brexit vote. Drawing on rich interview material from the Brexit Witness Archive, this article illustrates how the experience of individual and collective emotions deeply colored the work of British Government in delivering Brexit. The article concludes with a research agenda for public administration that foregrounds emotions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Review
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13901
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political and Economic history of UK and US
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How does government feel? Toward a theory of institutional pathos in public administration

Mari‐Klara Stein, Jack Corbett, John Boswell, Dennis Grube
1 citations
Public Administration Review
Political and Economic history of UK and US
2.23
article

How does government feel? Toward a theory of institutional pathos in public administration

Mari‐Klara Stein, Jack Corbett, John Boswell, Dennis Grube
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the study of policy and administration, emotions are largely conceived as an exogenous factor that impacts on institutions and processes. Still ignored are the emotions felt and performed not just individually by civil servants, but collectively within government organizations. This article turns to insights on emotions from organizational studies to offer a conceptual framework through which to understand the lifeworld of government, or “institutional pathos.” It then applies this framework to an extreme case: Whitehall's response to the Brexit vote. Drawing on rich interview material from the Brexit Witness Archive, this article illustrates how the experience of individual and collective emotions deeply colored the work of British Government in delivering Brexit. The article concludes with a research agenda for public administration that foregrounds emotions.

Public Administration ReviewVol. 85(4)
Estonian Business School (EE), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Southampton (GB), Monash University (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Political and Economic history of UK and US
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How does government <i>feel?</i> Toward a theory of institutional pathos in public administration — Mari‐Klara Stein, Jack Corbett, et al. · Public Administration Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS