Process–Material–Performance Trade-off Exploration of Materials Sintering with Machine Learning Models

Abstract Process-induced porosity, defects, and residual stresses lead to mechanical performance degradation in fiber-reinforced composite and other heterogeneous structures. Physical and chemical processes create complex process–material–performance relationships. Predicting porosity and residual stresses in this context requires computationally burdensome forward simulations and obtaining optimal process settings and calibrating properties of new materials requires solving inverse problems with predictions from the forward simulations. In this paper, we parameterized the process–material–performance space and created a dataset based on physics models that are valid for sintering ceramic powders. The dataset was used to train several machine learning models that captured the process–material–performance relationships. The trained ML models were applied in process optimization, calibration of properties for new material systems, and estimating performance for a given process and material. Support vector regression (SVR), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) called REPAIRS were selected, and their prediction accuracy was determined. While the SVR and CNN models require training several models, we show that the GMM model captures the process–material–performance relationships with a single machine-learned model and partial system completion methods. The paper describes root-mean-square error and mean absolute percentage errors of the inferences from the models on a validation dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrating materials and manufacturing innovation
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-024-00380-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Injection Molding Process and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Process–Material–Performance Trade-off Exploration of Materials Sintering with Machine Learning Models

Prerit Terway, Padmalatha Kakanuru, Kishore Pochiraju, Niraj K. Jha
1 citations
Integrating materials and manufacturing innovation
Injection Molding Process and Properties
0.21
article

Process–Material–Performance Trade-off Exploration of Materials Sintering with Machine Learning Models

Prerit Terway, Padmalatha Kakanuru, Kishore Pochiraju, Niraj K. Jha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Process-induced porosity, defects, and residual stresses lead to mechanical performance degradation in fiber-reinforced composite and other heterogeneous structures. Physical and chemical processes create complex process–material–performance relationships. Predicting porosity and residual stresses in this context requires computationally burdensome forward simulations and obtaining optimal process settings and calibrating properties of new materials requires solving inverse problems with predictions from the forward simulations. In this paper, we parameterized the process–material–performance space and created a dataset based on physics models that are valid for sintering ceramic powders. The dataset was used to train several machine learning models that captured the process–material–performance relationships. The trained ML models were applied in process optimization, calibration of properties for new material systems, and estimating performance for a given process and material. Support vector regression (SVR), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) called REPAIRS were selected, and their prediction accuracy was determined. While the SVR and CNN models require training several models, we show that the GMM model captures the process–material–performance relationships with a single machine-learned model and partial system completion methods. The paper describes root-mean-square error and mean absolute percentage errors of the inferences from the models on a validation dataset.

Integrating materials and manufacturing innovationVol. 13(4)
Stevens Institute of Technology (US), Princeton University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Injection Molding Process and Properties
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.