"Communities Don't Want Us to Roll In and Roll Out":  Beyond the Baseline to Sustainable and Mutually Beneficial University-Community Partnerships for Societal Impacts.

This article features a case study conducted by University of Oklahoma’s Center for Faculty Excellence (CFE) of faculty National Science Foundation CAREER research grant proposals. Specifically, of interest to us is how the Broader Impacts sections of our faculty’s applications might be strengthened with the help of the Advancing Research in Society (ARIS) rubric. We are also concerned with key principles of community engagement and how the ARIS rubric can lead faculty to develop mutually beneficial collaborations that increase community capacity and science literacy. Our study is described in the larger context of our mission and work at CFE and the nationwide imperative to orient higher education and research toward a larger societal good.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54656/jces.v17i2.612
Primary Topic
Service-Learning and Community Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"Communities Don't Want Us to Roll In and Roll Out":  Beyond the Baseline to Sustainable and Mutually Beneficial University-Community Partnerships for Societal Impacts.

Mohommad Shahid, Joy Pendley
Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship
Service-Learning and Community Engagement
article

"Communities Don't Want Us to Roll In and Roll Out":  Beyond the Baseline to Sustainable and Mutually Beneficial University-Community Partnerships for Societal Impacts.

Mohommad Shahid, Joy Pendley
article en

Abstract

This article features a case study conducted by University of Oklahoma’s Center for Faculty Excellence (CFE) of faculty National Science Foundation CAREER research grant proposals. Specifically, of interest to us is how the Broader Impacts sections of our faculty’s applications might be strengthened with the help of the Advancing Research in Society (ARIS) rubric. We are also concerned with key principles of community engagement and how the ARIS rubric can lead faculty to develop mutually beneficial collaborations that increase community capacity and science literacy. Our study is described in the larger context of our mission and work at CFE and the nationwide imperative to orient higher education and research toward a larger societal good.

Journal of Community Engagement and ScholarshipVol. 17(2)
National Science Foundation, University of Oklahoma
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Service-Learning and Community Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.