How Can Graph Theory Inform the Dual-stream Model of Speech Processing? A Resting-state Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Stroke and Aphasia Symptomology

The dual-stream model of speech processing describes a cortical network involved in speech processing. However, it is not yet known if the dual-stream model represents actual intrinsic functional brain networks. Furthermore, it is unclear how disruptions after a stroke to the functional connectivity of the dual-stream model's regions are related to speech production and comprehension impairments seen in aphasia. To address these questions, in the present study, we examined two independent resting-state fMRI data sets: (1) 28 neurotypical matched controls and (2) 28 chronic left-hemisphere stroke survivors collected at another site. We successfully identified an intrinsic functional network among the dual-stream model's regions in the control group using functional connectivity. We then used both standard functional connectivity analyses and graph theory approaches to determine how this connectivity may predict performance on clinical aphasia assessments. Our findings provide evidence that the dual-stream model of speech processing is an intrinsic network as measured via resting-state MRI and that functional connectivity of the hub nodes of the dual-stream network defined by graph theory methods, but not overall average network connectivity, is weaker in the stroke group than in the control participants. In addition, the functional connectivity of the hub nodes predicted linguistic impairments on clinical assessments. In particular, the relative strength of connectivity of the right hemisphere's homologues of the left dorsal stream hubs to the left dorsal hubs, versus to the right ventral stream hubs, is a particularly strong predictor of poststroke aphasia severity and symptomology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_02278
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Can Graph Theory Inform the Dual-stream Model of Speech Processing? A Resting-state Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Stroke and Aphasia Symptomology

Haoze Zhu, Julius Fridriksson, Megan C. Fitzhugh, Lynsey M. Keator et al.
2 citations
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
0.69
article

How Can Graph Theory Inform the Dual-stream Model of Speech Processing? A Resting-state Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Stroke and Aphasia Symptomology

Haoze Zhu, Julius Fridriksson, Megan C. Fitzhugh, Lynsey M. Keator, Leonardo Bonilha, Corianne Rogalsky, Lisa Johnson, Chris Rorden
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The dual-stream model of speech processing describes a cortical network involved in speech processing. However, it is not yet known if the dual-stream model represents actual intrinsic functional brain networks. Furthermore, it is unclear how disruptions after a stroke to the functional connectivity of the dual-stream model's regions are related to speech production and comprehension impairments seen in aphasia. To address these questions, in the present study, we examined two independent resting-state fMRI data sets: (1) 28 neurotypical matched controls and (2) 28 chronic left-hemisphere stroke survivors collected at another site. We successfully identified an intrinsic functional network among the dual-stream model's regions in the control group using functional connectivity. We then used both standard functional connectivity analyses and graph theory approaches to determine how this connectivity may predict performance on clinical aphasia assessments. Our findings provide evidence that the dual-stream model of speech processing is an intrinsic network as measured via resting-state MRI and that functional connectivity of the hub nodes of the dual-stream network defined by graph theory methods, but not overall average network connectivity, is weaker in the stroke group than in the control participants. In addition, the functional connectivity of the hub nodes predicted linguistic impairments on clinical assessments. In particular, the relative strength of connectivity of the right hemisphere's homologues of the left dorsal stream hubs to the left dorsal hubs, versus to the right ventral stream hubs, is a particularly strong predictor of poststroke aphasia severity and symptomology.

Journal of Cognitive NeuroscienceVol. 37(3)
Emory University (US), University of South Carolina (US), University of California San Diego (US), Arizona State University (US), University of Delaware (US)
Arizona State University, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.