The Ethical Case for Decentralized Clinical Trials
The recent pandemic spurred interest in innovative design for clinical trials. In particular, constraints on the public's ability to gather led to an increase in remote or decentralized clinical trials (DCTs). DCTs present an opportunity to extend the benefits of research to underserved populations, decrease burdens, increase access to trials, and fill knowledge gaps surrounding rare conditions, though they are not without their own unique challenges and risks. These risks are far from irremediable, and the advantages are significant enough to merit attention. There is a scientific and moral case to increase the use of DCTs beyond the context of public health emergencies.
Authors
- Ivan Teo
- Kathryn Muyskens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8506-0659)
- G. Owen Schaefer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6915-6148)
- Jerry Menikoff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7032-3070)
Institutions
- National University of Singapore (SG)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ethics & Human Research
- Published
- 2024-11-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500229
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Ethics in Clinical Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.17
Funders
- Medical Research Council
- National Medical Research Council