The Ethical Case for Decentralized Clinical Trials

The recent pandemic spurred interest in innovative design for clinical trials. In particular, constraints on the public's ability to gather led to an increase in remote or decentralized clinical trials (DCTs). DCTs present an opportunity to extend the benefits of research to underserved populations, decrease burdens, increase access to trials, and fill knowledge gaps surrounding rare conditions, though they are not without their own unique challenges and risks. These risks are far from irremediable, and the advantages are significant enough to merit attention. There is a scientific and moral case to increase the use of DCTs beyond the context of public health emergencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics & Human Research
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500229
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ethical Case for Decentralized Clinical Trials

Ivan Teo, Kathryn Muyskens, G. Owen Schaefer, Jerry Menikoff
4 citations
Ethics & Human Research
Ethics in Clinical Research
2.17
article

The Ethical Case for Decentralized Clinical Trials

Ivan Teo, Kathryn Muyskens, G. Owen Schaefer, Jerry Menikoff
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The recent pandemic spurred interest in innovative design for clinical trials. In particular, constraints on the public's ability to gather led to an increase in remote or decentralized clinical trials (DCTs). DCTs present an opportunity to extend the benefits of research to underserved populations, decrease burdens, increase access to trials, and fill knowledge gaps surrounding rare conditions, though they are not without their own unique challenges and risks. These risks are far from irremediable, and the advantages are significant enough to merit attention. There is a scientific and moral case to increase the use of DCTs beyond the context of public health emergencies.

Ethics & Human ResearchVol. 46(6)
National University of Singapore (SG)
Medical Research Council, National Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethics in Clinical Research
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.