Will GPT-4 Run <i>DOOM</i>?

We show that GPT-4’s reasoning and planning capabilities extend to the 1993 first-person shooter <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Doom</i>. This large language model (LLM) is able to run and play the game with only a few instructions, plus a textual description–generated by the model itself from screenshots–about the state of the game being observed. We find that GPT-4 can play the game to a passable degree: it is able to manipulate doors, combat enemies, and perform pathing. More complex prompting strategies involving multiple model calls provide better results. While further work is required to enable the LLM to play the game as well as its classical, reinforcement learning-based counterparts, we note that GPT-4 required no training, leaning instead on its own reasoning and observational capabilities. We hope our work pushes the boundaries on intelligent, LLM-based agents in video games. We conclude by discussing the ethical implications of our work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Games
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tg.2024.3497601
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Will GPT-4 Run DOOM?

Adrian de Wynter
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Games
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
0.35
article

Will GPT-4 Run DOOM?

Adrian de Wynter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We show that GPT-4’s reasoning and planning capabilities extend to the 1993 first-person shooter <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Doom</i>. This large language model (LLM) is able to run and play the game with only a few instructions, plus a textual description–generated by the model itself from screenshots–about the state of the game being observed. We find that GPT-4 can play the game to a passable degree: it is able to manipulate doors, combat enemies, and perform pathing. More complex prompting strategies involving multiple model calls provide better results. While further work is required to enable the LLM to play the game as well as its classical, reinforcement learning-based counterparts, we note that GPT-4 required no training, leaning instead on its own reasoning and observational capabilities. We hope our work pushes the boundaries on intelligent, LLM-based agents in video games. We conclude by discussing the ethical implications of our work.

IEEE Transactions on GamesVol. 17(2)
Microsoft (United States) (US), Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB), University of York (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Will GPT-4 Run <i>DOOM</i>? — Adrian de Wynter · IEEE Transactions on Games (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS