Keeping the global consumption within the planetary boundaries

The disparity in environmental impacts across different countries has been widely acknowledged<sup>1,2</sup>. However, ascertaining the specific responsibility within the complex interactions of economies and consumption groups remains a challenging endeavour<sup>3-5</sup>. Here, using an expenditure database that includes up to 201 consumption groups across 168 countries, we investigate the distribution of 6 environmental footprint indicators and assess the impact of specific consumption expenditures on planetary boundary transgressions. We show that 31-67% and 51-91% of the planetary boundary breaching responsibility could be attributed to the global top 10% and top 20% of consumers, respectively, from both developed and developing countries. By following an effective mitigation pathway, the global top 20% of consumers could adopt the consumption levels and patterns that have the lowest environmental impacts within their quintile, yielding a reduction of 25-53% in environmental pressure. In this scenario, actions focused solely on the food and services sectors would reduce environmental pressure enough to bring land-system change and biosphere integrity back within their respective planetary boundaries. Our study highlights the critical need to focus on high-expenditure consumers for effectively addressing planetary boundary transgressions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08154-w
Citations
91
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Keeping the global consumption within the planetary boundaries

Ning Zhang, Peipei Tian, Xuan Shao, Laixiang Sun et al.
91 citations
Nature
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
9.32
article

Keeping the global consumption within the planetary boundaries

Ning Zhang, Peipei Tian, Xuan Shao, Laixiang Sun, Yu Liu, Kuishuang Feng, Xiangjie Chen, Honglin Zhong, Klaus Hubacek
article en
91 citations

Abstract

The disparity in environmental impacts across different countries has been widely acknowledged<sup>1,2</sup>. However, ascertaining the specific responsibility within the complex interactions of economies and consumption groups remains a challenging endeavour<sup>3-5</sup>. Here, using an expenditure database that includes up to 201 consumption groups across 168 countries, we investigate the distribution of 6 environmental footprint indicators and assess the impact of specific consumption expenditures on planetary boundary transgressions. We show that 31-67% and 51-91% of the planetary boundary breaching responsibility could be attributed to the global top 10% and top 20% of consumers, respectively, from both developed and developing countries. By following an effective mitigation pathway, the global top 20% of consumers could adopt the consumption levels and patterns that have the lowest environmental impacts within their quintile, yielding a reduction of 25-53% in environmental pressure. In this scenario, actions focused solely on the food and services sectors would reduce environmental pressure enough to bring land-system change and biosphere integrity back within their respective planetary boundaries. Our study highlights the critical need to focus on high-expenditure consumers for effectively addressing planetary boundary transgressions.

NatureVol. 635(8039)
Shandong University (CN), University of Groningen (NL), Peking University (CN), University of Cambridge (GB), SOAS University of London (GB), Weihai Science and Technology Bureau (CN), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
9.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.