Keeping the global consumption within the planetary boundaries
The disparity in environmental impacts across different countries has been widely acknowledged<sup>1,2</sup>. However, ascertaining the specific responsibility within the complex interactions of economies and consumption groups remains a challenging endeavour<sup>3-5</sup>. Here, using an expenditure database that includes up to 201 consumption groups across 168 countries, we investigate the distribution of 6 environmental footprint indicators and assess the impact of specific consumption expenditures on planetary boundary transgressions. We show that 31-67% and 51-91% of the planetary boundary breaching responsibility could be attributed to the global top 10% and top 20% of consumers, respectively, from both developed and developing countries. By following an effective mitigation pathway, the global top 20% of consumers could adopt the consumption levels and patterns that have the lowest environmental impacts within their quintile, yielding a reduction of 25-53% in environmental pressure. In this scenario, actions focused solely on the food and services sectors would reduce environmental pressure enough to bring land-system change and biosphere integrity back within their respective planetary boundaries. Our study highlights the critical need to focus on high-expenditure consumers for effectively addressing planetary boundary transgressions.
Authors
- Ning Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5634-4203)
- Peipei Tian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0465-4098)
- Xuan Shao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4096-9428)
- Laixiang Sun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7784-7942)
- Yu Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4605-0110)
- Kuishuang Feng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5139-444X)
- Xiangjie Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4884-2587)
- Honglin Zhong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1236-6037)
- Klaus Hubacek (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2561-6090)
Institutions
- Shandong University (CN)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Peking University (CN)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- SOAS University of London (GB)
- Weihai Science and Technology Bureau (CN)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nature
- Published
- 2024-11-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08154-w
- Citations
- 91
- Primary Topic
- Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 9.32