Dryland pea seeding rates can be reduced without yield or economic penalty

Abstract Montana is the leading producer of field peas ( Pisum sativum L.) in the United States. A density of 8 to 10 plants ft −2 is recommended when growing field peas in that state, but this recommendation is based on work done elsewhere. Field experiments were conducted in central Montana from 2021 through 2023 and at three additional locations in the final year to determine the yield and the economically optimum plant population (EOPP) when growing field peas for grain. The semi‐leafless, yellow‐cotyledon variety Montech 4152 was planted at five rates (5, 7, 9, 11, and 13 pure live seed [PLS] ft −2 ) in all 3 years with two additional rates (3 and 15 PLS ft −2 ) added in the final year. A minimum plant density of 6 to 8 plants ft −2 , or planting field pea at 7 to 9 PLS ft −2 , produced a grain yield comparable to or greater than amounts produced at other seeding rates. The minimum EOPP across the six experiments ranged from 3 (2.8) to 7 (6.4) plants ft −2 , corresponding to a seeding rate of 3 to 7 PLS ft −2 . However, more weeds were observed when field pea was planted at 3 PLS ft −2 than at higher rates in one of the experiments. A field pea density of 6 to 8 plants ft −2 is sufficient to optimize grain yield and economic returns in Montana and similar dryland environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70009
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dryland pea seeding rates can be reduced without yield or economic penalty

Patrick M. Carr, Perry R. Miller, Justin M. Vetch, P. F. Lamb et al.
1 citations
Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
0.60
article

Dryland pea seeding rates can be reduced without yield or economic penalty

Patrick M. Carr, Perry R. Miller, Justin M. Vetch, P. F. Lamb, Samuel T. Koeshall, Jessica A. Torrion, Simon Fordyce
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Montana is the leading producer of field peas ( Pisum sativum L.) in the United States. A density of 8 to 10 plants ft −2 is recommended when growing field peas in that state, but this recommendation is based on work done elsewhere. Field experiments were conducted in central Montana from 2021 through 2023 and at three additional locations in the final year to determine the yield and the economically optimum plant population (EOPP) when growing field peas for grain. The semi‐leafless, yellow‐cotyledon variety Montech 4152 was planted at five rates (5, 7, 9, 11, and 13 pure live seed [PLS] ft −2 ) in all 3 years with two additional rates (3 and 15 PLS ft −2 ) added in the final year. A minimum plant density of 6 to 8 plants ft −2 , or planting field pea at 7 to 9 PLS ft −2 , produced a grain yield comparable to or greater than amounts produced at other seeding rates. The minimum EOPP across the six experiments ranged from 3 (2.8) to 7 (6.4) plants ft −2 , corresponding to a seeding rate of 3 to 7 PLS ft −2 . However, more weeds were observed when field pea was planted at 3 PLS ft −2 than at higher rates in one of the experiments. A field pea density of 6 to 8 plants ft −2 is sufficient to optimize grain yield and economic returns in Montana and similar dryland environments.

Crop Forage & Turfgrass ManagementVol. 10(2)
Montana State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.