Abstract 4136442: Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-coated balloons versus Uncoated balloons in the Management of Coronary in-stent restenosis: a Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction: Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains challenging despite stent technology advancements. Paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) offer a promising non-implant approach to deliver antiproliferative agents directly to the vessel wall. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of PCB versus uncoated balloons (UCB) in managing coronary ISR to address emerging safety concerns. Methodology: Medline, Scopus and Embase were searched until April 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PCB versus UCB in patients undergoing coronary ISR. Primary outcomes were in-segment late lumen loss (LLL), binary restenosis, target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-stent LLL, in-stent binary restenosis, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, target vessel MI, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results: This meta-analysis includes seven RCTs with 1,408 patients (PCB = 864, UCB = 544). PCB significantly reduced in-segment LLL (MD= -0.50, 95% CI [-0.67, -0.33]; P < 0.00001), in-segment binary restenosis (RR= 0.25, 95% CI [0.14, 0.45]; P < 0.00001), target lesion revascularization (RR= 0.43, 95% CI [0.32, 0.58]; P < 0.00001), mortality (RR=0.56, 95% CI [0.39, 0.80]; P=0.001), and MACE (RR= 0.36, 95% CI [0.25, 0.51]; P < 0.00001). PCB also significantly decreased in-stent LLL (MD= -0.52, 95% CI [-0.72, -0.32]; P < 0.00001), in-stent binary restenosis (RR = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11, 0.35]; P < 0.00001), and TVR (RR = 0.45, 95% CI [0.29, 0.70]; P = 0.0003). PCB showed a short-term reduction in MACE and target lesion revascularization at 6 months, 1 year and 3 years of followup. No difference was observed in MI, cardiac death, or target vessel MI. Conclusion: In patients with coronary ISR, PCB are associated with reduced in-segment LLL, in-segment binary restenosis events, target lesion revascularization, mortality, MACE, in-stent LLL, in-stent binary restenosis and target vessel revascularization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4136442
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4136442: Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-coated balloons versus Uncoated balloons in the Management of Coronary in-stent restenosis: a Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Sakina Aquil, Abdul Moeed, Malaika Saeed Butt, Carol Christina et al.
Circulation
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

Abstract 4136442: Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-coated balloons versus Uncoated balloons in the Management of Coronary in-stent restenosis: a Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Sakina Aquil, Abdul Moeed, Malaika Saeed Butt, Carol Christina, Courtney Bennett, Hala Najeeb, Mahboob Alam, Muhammad Khalid, Ayesha Rasheed, Hamna Kashif, Muhammad Aamir, Wajiha Gul, Beena Muntaha Nasir, Javeria Malik, Mutiba Aslam
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains challenging despite stent technology advancements. Paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) offer a promising non-implant approach to deliver antiproliferative agents directly to the vessel wall. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of PCB versus uncoated balloons (UCB) in managing coronary ISR to address emerging safety concerns. Methodology: Medline, Scopus and Embase were searched until April 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PCB versus UCB in patients undergoing coronary ISR. Primary outcomes were in-segment late lumen loss (LLL), binary restenosis, target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-stent LLL, in-stent binary restenosis, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, target vessel MI, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results: This meta-analysis includes seven RCTs with 1,408 patients (PCB = 864, UCB = 544). PCB significantly reduced in-segment LLL (MD= -0.50, 95% CI [-0.67, -0.33]; P < 0.00001), in-segment binary restenosis (RR= 0.25, 95% CI [0.14, 0.45]; P < 0.00001), target lesion revascularization (RR= 0.43, 95% CI [0.32, 0.58]; P < 0.00001), mortality (RR=0.56, 95% CI [0.39, 0.80]; P=0.001), and MACE (RR= 0.36, 95% CI [0.25, 0.51]; P < 0.00001). PCB also significantly decreased in-stent LLL (MD= -0.52, 95% CI [-0.72, -0.32]; P < 0.00001), in-stent binary restenosis (RR = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11, 0.35]; P < 0.00001), and TVR (RR = 0.45, 95% CI [0.29, 0.70]; P = 0.0003). PCB showed a short-term reduction in MACE and target lesion revascularization at 6 months, 1 year and 3 years of followup. No difference was observed in MI, cardiac death, or target vessel MI. Conclusion: In patients with coronary ISR, PCB are associated with reduced in-segment LLL, in-segment binary restenosis events, target lesion revascularization, mortality, MACE, in-stent LLL, in-stent binary restenosis and target vessel revascularization.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Baylor College of Medicine (US), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK), Lehigh Valley Health Network (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.