Abstract 4136442: Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-coated balloons versus Uncoated balloons in the Management of Coronary in-stent restenosis: a Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Introduction: Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains challenging despite stent technology advancements. Paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) offer a promising non-implant approach to deliver antiproliferative agents directly to the vessel wall. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of PCB versus uncoated balloons (UCB) in managing coronary ISR to address emerging safety concerns. Methodology: Medline, Scopus and Embase were searched until April 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PCB versus UCB in patients undergoing coronary ISR. Primary outcomes were in-segment late lumen loss (LLL), binary restenosis, target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-stent LLL, in-stent binary restenosis, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, target vessel MI, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results: This meta-analysis includes seven RCTs with 1,408 patients (PCB = 864, UCB = 544). PCB significantly reduced in-segment LLL (MD= -0.50, 95% CI [-0.67, -0.33]; P < 0.00001), in-segment binary restenosis (RR= 0.25, 95% CI [0.14, 0.45]; P < 0.00001), target lesion revascularization (RR= 0.43, 95% CI [0.32, 0.58]; P < 0.00001), mortality (RR=0.56, 95% CI [0.39, 0.80]; P=0.001), and MACE (RR= 0.36, 95% CI [0.25, 0.51]; P < 0.00001). PCB also significantly decreased in-stent LLL (MD= -0.52, 95% CI [-0.72, -0.32]; P < 0.00001), in-stent binary restenosis (RR = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11, 0.35]; P < 0.00001), and TVR (RR = 0.45, 95% CI [0.29, 0.70]; P = 0.0003). PCB showed a short-term reduction in MACE and target lesion revascularization at 6 months, 1 year and 3 years of followup. No difference was observed in MI, cardiac death, or target vessel MI. Conclusion: In patients with coronary ISR, PCB are associated with reduced in-segment LLL, in-segment binary restenosis events, target lesion revascularization, mortality, MACE, in-stent LLL, in-stent binary restenosis and target vessel revascularization.
Authors
- Sakina Aquil (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6899-2670)
- Abdul Moeed
- Malaika Saeed Butt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6070-426X)
- Carol Christina
- Courtney Bennett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7186-1009)
- Hala Najeeb (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7075-4674)
- Mahboob Alam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5188-1130)
- Muhammad Khalid (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8528-8143)
- Ayesha Rasheed (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8420-4734)
- Hamna Kashif
- Muhammad Aamir (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1440-8810)
- Wajiha Gul (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0916-8937)
- Beena Muntaha Nasir (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7893-9807)
- Javeria Malik (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1646-817X)
- Mutiba Aslam
Institutions
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Dow University of Health Sciences (PK)
- Lehigh Valley Health Network (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Circulation
- Published
- 2024-11-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4136442
- Primary Topic
- Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00