Abstract 4135726: Prospective validation and implementation pilot study of an emergency department heart failure risk stratification tool: STRIDE-HF

Background: We previously found the STRIDE-HF emergency department (ED) risk tool accurately predicted risk of a 30-day serious adverse event (SAE), including 30-day mortality, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intra-aortic balloon pump insertion, intubation, new dialysis, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization. Research question: We sought to prospectively validate STRIDE-HF and describe safety of the deployed model in a clinical pilot. We hypothesized that performance would decrease slightly with prospective evaluation and that real-time risk display would contribute to safe disposition decisions. Goals: 1) To prospectively validate KPCARES-HF across 21 community EDs among ED patients with acute heart failure (AHF) from January 1, 2023 – December 31 st , 2023; and 2) to describe outcomes among patients predicted to be very low risk and discharged home in the clinical pilot. Methods: For prospective validation, we report 30-day mortality rates by risk strata. We assess model performance using area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) and sensitivity at a key clinical threshold. We describe rates of 30-day SAE among patients predicted to be very low risk and discharged after ED or observation unit care in the clinical pilot. Results: There were 13,274 ED patients in the prospective validation; median age was 76, 50.8% were female, and 44.5% were non-White. We found 11.4%, 24.8%, 31.9%, and 31.9% of patients were very low, low, moderate, and high risk, respectively, while 21.6%, 15.2% and 63.0% were discharged, observed, and admitted, respectively. Among discharged patients, 29.2% and 13.3% were moderate or high risk, respectively, and 30-day mortality rates among these patients were 2.2% and 8.4%, respectively. Among 8,363 admitted patients, 27.7% were very low or low risk. Conclusions: STRIDE-HF maintained high predictive accuracy with prospective validation in this diverse, multi-center cohort. Our findings suggest that use of STRIDE-HF might help better align risk with admission decision and can be safely used to assist providers in identifying patients who may be stable for outpatient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4135726
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4135726: Prospective validation and implementation pilot study of an emergency department heart failure risk stratification tool: STRIDE-HF

Dustin G. Mark, R. P. Norris, Michal Solomon, Jie Huang et al.
Circulation
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
article

Abstract 4135726: Prospective validation and implementation pilot study of an emergency department heart failure risk stratification tool: STRIDE-HF

Dustin G. Mark, R. P. Norris, Michal Solomon, Jie Huang, Mary Reed, Dana R. Sax, Jamal S. Rana
article en

Abstract

Background: We previously found the STRIDE-HF emergency department (ED) risk tool accurately predicted risk of a 30-day serious adverse event (SAE), including 30-day mortality, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intra-aortic balloon pump insertion, intubation, new dialysis, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization. Research question: We sought to prospectively validate STRIDE-HF and describe safety of the deployed model in a clinical pilot. We hypothesized that performance would decrease slightly with prospective evaluation and that real-time risk display would contribute to safe disposition decisions. Goals: 1) To prospectively validate KPCARES-HF across 21 community EDs among ED patients with acute heart failure (AHF) from January 1, 2023 – December 31 st , 2023; and 2) to describe outcomes among patients predicted to be very low risk and discharged home in the clinical pilot. Methods: For prospective validation, we report 30-day mortality rates by risk strata. We assess model performance using area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) and sensitivity at a key clinical threshold. We describe rates of 30-day SAE among patients predicted to be very low risk and discharged after ED or observation unit care in the clinical pilot. Results: There were 13,274 ED patients in the prospective validation; median age was 76, 50.8% were female, and 44.5% were non-White. We found 11.4%, 24.8%, 31.9%, and 31.9% of patients were very low, low, moderate, and high risk, respectively, while 21.6%, 15.2% and 63.0% were discharged, observed, and admitted, respectively. Among discharged patients, 29.2% and 13.3% were moderate or high risk, respectively, and 30-day mortality rates among these patients were 2.2% and 8.4%, respectively. Among 8,363 admitted patients, 27.7% were very low or low risk. Conclusions: STRIDE-HF maintained high predictive accuracy with prospective validation in this diverse, multi-center cohort. Our findings suggest that use of STRIDE-HF might help better align risk with admission decision and can be safely used to assist providers in identifying patients who may be stable for outpatient care.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Kaiser Permanente (US), Colorado Permanente Medical Group (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.