Abstract 4135899: Large-Scale Investigation on the Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Liver Cirrhosis Patients

Background: Catheter-based atrial fibrillation(AF) ablation is amongst the most commonly done EP procedures that have evolved over decades, improving patient outcomes and quality of life. Atrial fibrillation is seen in 5% of patients with cirrhosis and studies have shown AF in cirrhosis to be associated with increased mortality and adverse hospital outcomes. Aim: There is scarce literature on the outcomes of AF ablation in patients with cirrhosis. Our study aimed to study the safety and efficacy of catheter-based AF ablations in this population group and to ascertain if there is a difference compared to the general patient population. Methods: We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database 2016-2020, the largest openly accessible inpatient healthcare database in the United States. Patients with a primary diagnosis of AF were identified using ICD-10 codes. We excluded patients with a secondary diagnosis of other arrhythmias, missing demographics, mortality, or age<18. The study population was divided into patients with and without cirrhosis. Information was collected regarding various patient demographic characteristics and comorbidities (comorbidity burden captured via Elixhauser Comorbidity Index). The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. The secondary endpoints were total complications, length of stay, and hospitalization charges. Results: A total of 23,905 patients underwent ablation, with 23,800 being non-cirrhotic, and only 105 presenting with cirrhosis. This signifies a relatively low proportion of cirrhotic patients undergoing ablation procedures, approximately 0.6% (105 out of a total of 17,600 cirrhotic patients). Additionally, the Elixhauser comorbidity index is significantly higher in cirrhotic patients (6.62) compared to non-cirrhotic patients (3.65) with a p-value <0.001, indicating a higher burden of comorbidities in the cirrhotic group. Patients with cirrhosis undergoing ablation procedures exhibit a notably higher risk of major bleeding compared to those without cirrhosis (14.3% vs. 4.06%, p-value = 0.02). Furthermore, the incidence of bleeding requiring transfusion is significantly elevated in cirrhotic patients (4.8%) in contrast to non-cirrhotic patients (0.2%) (p-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Although the risk of major bleeding is high, overall mortality and other complications are comparable to those without cirrhosis. We believe that this can be mitigated by carefully selecting the patients with cirrhosis for this procedure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4135899
Primary Topic
Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4135899: Large-Scale Investigation on the Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Liver Cirrhosis Patients

Soumiya Ravi, Aalam Sohal, Ayushi Garg, Ajit Singh Brar
Circulation
Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
article

Abstract 4135899: Large-Scale Investigation on the Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Liver Cirrhosis Patients

Soumiya Ravi, Aalam Sohal, Ayushi Garg, Ajit Singh Brar
article en

Abstract

Background: Catheter-based atrial fibrillation(AF) ablation is amongst the most commonly done EP procedures that have evolved over decades, improving patient outcomes and quality of life. Atrial fibrillation is seen in 5% of patients with cirrhosis and studies have shown AF in cirrhosis to be associated with increased mortality and adverse hospital outcomes. Aim: There is scarce literature on the outcomes of AF ablation in patients with cirrhosis. Our study aimed to study the safety and efficacy of catheter-based AF ablations in this population group and to ascertain if there is a difference compared to the general patient population. Methods: We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database 2016-2020, the largest openly accessible inpatient healthcare database in the United States. Patients with a primary diagnosis of AF were identified using ICD-10 codes. We excluded patients with a secondary diagnosis of other arrhythmias, missing demographics, mortality, or age<18. The study population was divided into patients with and without cirrhosis. Information was collected regarding various patient demographic characteristics and comorbidities (comorbidity burden captured via Elixhauser Comorbidity Index). The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. The secondary endpoints were total complications, length of stay, and hospitalization charges. Results: A total of 23,905 patients underwent ablation, with 23,800 being non-cirrhotic, and only 105 presenting with cirrhosis. This signifies a relatively low proportion of cirrhotic patients undergoing ablation procedures, approximately 0.6% (105 out of a total of 17,600 cirrhotic patients). Additionally, the Elixhauser comorbidity index is significantly higher in cirrhotic patients (6.62) compared to non-cirrhotic patients (3.65) with a p-value <0.001, indicating a higher burden of comorbidities in the cirrhotic group. Patients with cirrhosis undergoing ablation procedures exhibit a notably higher risk of major bleeding compared to those without cirrhosis (14.3% vs. 4.06%, p-value = 0.02). Furthermore, the incidence of bleeding requiring transfusion is significantly elevated in cirrhotic patients (4.8%) in contrast to non-cirrhotic patients (0.2%) (p-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Although the risk of major bleeding is high, overall mortality and other complications are comparable to those without cirrhosis. We believe that this can be mitigated by carefully selecting the patients with cirrhosis for this procedure.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Arizona (US), Hurley Medical Center (US), Liver Institute Northwest (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.