Abstract 4135872: Effects of In-vivo Contact Force on Pulsed Field Ablation Lesion Size in Porcine Ventricles

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an innovative modality for treating arrhythmias that is mostly non-thermal and renders myocardial tissue non-viable by creating pores in cardiac cell membranes. The impact of contact force (CF) on PFA efficacy is not well characterized. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that, while contact is necessary for PFA, increasing CF will not have a significant effect on in vivo ablation lesion size. Aim: We seek to investigate the effects of CF on acute PFA lesions in a beating porcine heart model. Methods: The ventricles of 7 porcine animals were ablated in vivo with PFA (500V, at 20μs for 50 pulses separated by 200ms) using a focal bipolar irrigated ablation catheter and BTX 830 electroporation generator (Harvard Apparatus). CF was measured before and after each PFA application using CARTO 3. Lesions were divided into standard CF (5-15g), high CF (16-30g), and very high CF (>31g). Results: A total of 46 lesions were analyzed. Gross pathology showed no significant difference in maximum width, lesion depth, and lesion volume between the three groups ( Figure 1A-B ). Linear regression showed a decrease of 0.003 mm in depth (depth = -0.003 × CF + 1.8, R = 0.05), an increase of 0.01 mm in width (width = 0.01 × CF + 5.7, R = 0.09), and a decrease of 0.05 mm 3 in volume (volume = -0.05 × CF + 26.8, R = 0.03) for each additional gram of CF ( Figure 1C ). Conclusion: While contact is necessary, increasing CF did not have a significant effect on in-vivo PFA lesion dimensions in a beating porcine heart model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4135872
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4135872: Effects of In-vivo Contact Force on Pulsed Field Ablation Lesion Size in Porcine Ventricles

Taro Koya, yang ying, Naoto Otsuka, Duy T. Nguyen et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
article

Abstract 4135872: Effects of In-vivo Contact Force on Pulsed Field Ablation Lesion Size in Porcine Ventricles

Taro Koya, yang ying, Naoto Otsuka, Duy T. Nguyen, Jason Tri, Samuel J. Asirvatham
article en

Abstract

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an innovative modality for treating arrhythmias that is mostly non-thermal and renders myocardial tissue non-viable by creating pores in cardiac cell membranes. The impact of contact force (CF) on PFA efficacy is not well characterized. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that, while contact is necessary for PFA, increasing CF will not have a significant effect on in vivo ablation lesion size. Aim: We seek to investigate the effects of CF on acute PFA lesions in a beating porcine heart model. Methods: The ventricles of 7 porcine animals were ablated in vivo with PFA (500V, at 20μs for 50 pulses separated by 200ms) using a focal bipolar irrigated ablation catheter and BTX 830 electroporation generator (Harvard Apparatus). CF was measured before and after each PFA application using CARTO 3. Lesions were divided into standard CF (5-15g), high CF (16-30g), and very high CF (>31g). Results: A total of 46 lesions were analyzed. Gross pathology showed no significant difference in maximum width, lesion depth, and lesion volume between the three groups ( Figure 1A-B ). Linear regression showed a decrease of 0.003 mm in depth (depth = -0.003 × CF + 1.8, R = 0.05), an increase of 0.01 mm in width (width = 0.01 × CF + 5.7, R = 0.09), and a decrease of 0.05 mm 3 in volume (volume = -0.05 × CF + 26.8, R = 0.03) for each additional gram of CF ( Figure 1C ). Conclusion: While contact is necessary, increasing CF did not have a significant effect on in-vivo PFA lesion dimensions in a beating porcine heart model.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Mayo Clinic (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.