Abstract 4136563: In-Hospital Outcomes of Percutaneous Versus Surgical Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With COPD

Background: Percutaneous mitral valve repair has been increasingly utilized for the treatment of mitral valve disease in the recent years, although surgical mitral valve repair and/or replacement remains the preferred therapy, especially for primary mitral regurgitation. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common comorbidity that can adversely affect outcomes of cardiac procedures. While COPD is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes after surgical mitral valve repair, its effects on percutaneous mitral valve repair is not well-defined. Methods: Using National Inpatient Sample data from 2011 to 2019, we conducted a retrospective study of adult patients with COPD who underwent surgical or percutaneous mitral valve repair, using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. We excluded patients with surgical mitral valve replacement. Patient baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared and adjusted for covariates to investigate outcomes using a logistic regression model. Statistical significance was determined with a p-value of <0.001. Results: A total of 18,050 patients with COPD were included. Of these, 10,308 (57.1%) underwent surgical mitral valve repair and 7,742 (42.9%) underwent percutaneous mitral valve repair. The percutaneous cohort had a higher prevalence of heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, pulmonary hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes, while the surgical cohort had a higher prevalence of obesity and atrial tachyarrhythmias. Percutaneous repair was associated with lower rates of mortality, intraoperative complications, postoperative shock, acute coronary syndrome, and transfusions. Upon logistic regression, percutaneous repair was associated with lower rates of mortality (OR 0.28; 99% CI [0.19-0.40]), acute kidney injury (OR 0.38; 99% CI [0.33-0.44]), pneumothorax (OR 0.14; 99% CI [0.09-0.22]), vascular complications (OR 0.40; 99% CI [0.26-0.62]), and infection (OR 0.54; 99% CI [0.39-0.73]; p<0.001 for all groups). Conclusions: In patients with COPD, percutaneous mitral valve repair is associated with lower mortality and procedural complications compared to surgical repair. The presence of COPD should be taken into consideration when deciding treatment strategy for patients with mitral valve disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4136563
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4136563: In-Hospital Outcomes of Percutaneous Versus Surgical Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With COPD

Esteban M. Rodríguez, Nikolaos Spilias, Rosario Colombo, Chetan Yarlagadda et al.
1 links
Circulation
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Abstract 4136563: In-Hospital Outcomes of Percutaneous Versus Surgical Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With COPD

Esteban M. Rodríguez, Nikolaos Spilias, Rosario Colombo, Chetan Yarlagadda, Bertrand Ebner, Michael Ugarov
article en

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous mitral valve repair has been increasingly utilized for the treatment of mitral valve disease in the recent years, although surgical mitral valve repair and/or replacement remains the preferred therapy, especially for primary mitral regurgitation. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common comorbidity that can adversely affect outcomes of cardiac procedures. While COPD is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes after surgical mitral valve repair, its effects on percutaneous mitral valve repair is not well-defined. Methods: Using National Inpatient Sample data from 2011 to 2019, we conducted a retrospective study of adult patients with COPD who underwent surgical or percutaneous mitral valve repair, using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. We excluded patients with surgical mitral valve replacement. Patient baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared and adjusted for covariates to investigate outcomes using a logistic regression model. Statistical significance was determined with a p-value of <0.001. Results: A total of 18,050 patients with COPD were included. Of these, 10,308 (57.1%) underwent surgical mitral valve repair and 7,742 (42.9%) underwent percutaneous mitral valve repair. The percutaneous cohort had a higher prevalence of heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, pulmonary hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes, while the surgical cohort had a higher prevalence of obesity and atrial tachyarrhythmias. Percutaneous repair was associated with lower rates of mortality, intraoperative complications, postoperative shock, acute coronary syndrome, and transfusions. Upon logistic regression, percutaneous repair was associated with lower rates of mortality (OR 0.28; 99% CI [0.19-0.40]), acute kidney injury (OR 0.38; 99% CI [0.33-0.44]), pneumothorax (OR 0.14; 99% CI [0.09-0.22]), vascular complications (OR 0.40; 99% CI [0.26-0.62]), and infection (OR 0.54; 99% CI [0.39-0.73]; p<0.001 for all groups). Conclusions: In patients with COPD, percutaneous mitral valve repair is associated with lower mortality and procedural complications compared to surgical repair. The presence of COPD should be taken into consideration when deciding treatment strategy for patients with mitral valve disease.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Miami (US), Jackson Health System (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.