Abstract 4135754: Prediction of Incident Atrial Fibrillation Using Handheld Single-Lead Electrocardiograms from the VITAL-AF Trial

Background: Deep learning of 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) can estimate future atrial fibrillation (AF) risk. Whether these models can be applied to single-lead ECGs (1L ECGs) from wearable or handheld devices is unknown. Aim: To apply a previously published deep learning model to estimate 2-year incident AF risk using handheld 1L ECGs obtained prospectively in a large AF screening trial. Methods: In the VITAL-AF trial (NCT03515057), over 16,000 primary care patients aged ≥65 years underwent AF screening with handheld 1L ECG. We applied our published deep learning model (ECG-AI) derived using single leads of over 450,000 standard 12-lead ECGs external to the VITAL-AF study (1L ECG-AI). We compared the performance of 1L ECG-AI to the validated CHARGE-AF clinical risk score and calculated net reclassification indices. Results: Among 15,694 individuals enrolled in VITAL-AF and without prevalent AF (age 74±7 years, 9,104 [58%] women), 1L ECG-AI discriminated 2-year incident AF (area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.666 [95% CI 0.603-0.721]). With addition of age and sex (1L ECG-AI AS), 2-year AF discrimination (0.695 [0.637-0.742]) was comparable to the 11-component CHARGE-AF clinical risk score (0.679 [0.625-0.729]). Two-year AF incidence was markedly higher with 1L ECG-AI AS in the top 5% (8.0% [5.7-10.2]) vs bottom 5% (0.89% [0.23-0.55]). At a threshold of ≥3% estimated 2-year AF risk, AF incidence was progressively higher among patients at high risk according to neither model (1.5% [1.2-1.8]), one model (1L ECG-AI: 3.3% [2.3-4.2]; CHARGE-AF 3.4% [2.2-4.6]), and both models (5.8% [5.0-6.5]), implying that clinical risk and ECG-AI signals are complementary ( Figure ). Compared to screening all individuals at the guideline-based threshold of ≥65 years, 1L ECG-AI AS resulted in favorable net reclassification improvement (0.27 [0.22-0.32]). Conclusion: An ECG-AI algorithm developed using single leads of a 12-lead ECG combined with age and sex can discriminate AF risk using real-world handheld 1L ECGs with comparable performance to the CHARGE-AF score. 1L ECG-AI signals complement clinical risk factors. ECG-AI applied to 1L ECG may increase the reach and efficiency of AF screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4135754
Citations
1
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4135754: Prediction of Incident Atrial Fibrillation Using Handheld Single-Lead Electrocardiograms from the VITAL-AF Trial

Jennifer E. Ho, Christopher D. Anderson, Daniel E. Singer, Shinwan Kany et al.
1 citations
Circulation
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
0.40
article

Abstract 4135754: Prediction of Incident Atrial Fibrillation Using Handheld Single-Lead Electrocardiograms from the VITAL-AF Trial

Jennifer E. Ho, Christopher D. Anderson, Daniel E. Singer, Shinwan Kany, Shaan Khurshid, Jeffrey M. Ashburner, Mostafa A. Al‐Alusi, David D. McManus, Sam Friedman, Steven J. Atlas, Patrick T. Ellinor, Mahnaz Maddah, Steven Lubitz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Deep learning of 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) can estimate future atrial fibrillation (AF) risk. Whether these models can be applied to single-lead ECGs (1L ECGs) from wearable or handheld devices is unknown. Aim: To apply a previously published deep learning model to estimate 2-year incident AF risk using handheld 1L ECGs obtained prospectively in a large AF screening trial. Methods: In the VITAL-AF trial (NCT03515057), over 16,000 primary care patients aged ≥65 years underwent AF screening with handheld 1L ECG. We applied our published deep learning model (ECG-AI) derived using single leads of over 450,000 standard 12-lead ECGs external to the VITAL-AF study (1L ECG-AI). We compared the performance of 1L ECG-AI to the validated CHARGE-AF clinical risk score and calculated net reclassification indices. Results: Among 15,694 individuals enrolled in VITAL-AF and without prevalent AF (age 74±7 years, 9,104 [58%] women), 1L ECG-AI discriminated 2-year incident AF (area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.666 [95% CI 0.603-0.721]). With addition of age and sex (1L ECG-AI AS), 2-year AF discrimination (0.695 [0.637-0.742]) was comparable to the 11-component CHARGE-AF clinical risk score (0.679 [0.625-0.729]). Two-year AF incidence was markedly higher with 1L ECG-AI AS in the top 5% (8.0% [5.7-10.2]) vs bottom 5% (0.89% [0.23-0.55]). At a threshold of ≥3% estimated 2-year AF risk, AF incidence was progressively higher among patients at high risk according to neither model (1.5% [1.2-1.8]), one model (1L ECG-AI: 3.3% [2.3-4.2]; CHARGE-AF 3.4% [2.2-4.6]), and both models (5.8% [5.0-6.5]), implying that clinical risk and ECG-AI signals are complementary ( Figure ). Compared to screening all individuals at the guideline-based threshold of ≥65 years, 1L ECG-AI AS resulted in favorable net reclassification improvement (0.27 [0.22-0.32]). Conclusion: An ECG-AI algorithm developed using single leads of a 12-lead ECG combined with age and sex can discriminate AF risk using real-world handheld 1L ECGs with comparable performance to the CHARGE-AF score. 1L ECG-AI signals complement clinical risk factors. ECG-AI applied to 1L ECG may increase the reach and efficiency of AF screening.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Broad Institute (US), Harvard University (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), Newton Wellesley Hospital (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Novartis (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.