Abstract 4136741: Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors and Lipid Reduction: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors offer additional lipid reduction beyond that achieved with statins. However, the optimal PCSK9 therapy for lowering lipid levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia and/or hyperlipidemia on background statin therapy remains unclear. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for RCTs assessing tafolecimab, evolocumab or alirocumab vs. placebo (administrated Q2W or Q4W, 12-week treatment) in patients with hypercholesterolemia and/or hyperlipidemia on medium-intensity statin up to March 28, 2024. The outcomes of interest were the percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) or lipoprotein(a) from baseline to the 12th week. A frequentist random-effect network meta-analysis was applied to calculate MD and 95% CI using Stata 16.0 software. Results: A total of 4960 patients [PCSK9 inhibitors (n=3230), placebo (n=1730)] across 13 RCTs were included. At week 12, tafolecimab, evolocumab and alirocumab (either Q2W or Q4W) all induced significant reductions in LDL-C levels compared to placebo ( Figure ). The efficacy of evolocumab Q2W was significantly higher compared with alirocumab Q2W (MD=-18.67%, 95% Cl [-29.59%, -7.74%]), while similar LDL-C reduction was observed in tafolecimab Q2W vs. alirocumab Q2W and evolocumab Q2W vs. tafolecimab Q2W. Furthermore, tafolecimab Q4W and evolocumab Q4W were more effective in lowering LDL-C levels compared to alirocumab Q4W (tafolecimab vs. alirocumab: MD=-23.66%, 95% Cl [-32.58%, -14.74%]; evolocumab vs. alirocumab: MD=-25.84%, 95% Cl [-34.21%, -17.46%]), while there was no difference between evolocumab Q4W and tafolecimab Q4W. Lastly, the ranking of the effects for reducing lipoprotein(a) levels was as follows: tafolecimab > evolocumab> alirocumab (either Q2W or Q4W). Conclusions: In patients with hypercholesterolemia and/or hyperlipidemia treated with medium-intensity statins, tafolecimab and evolocumab (either Q2W or Q4W) might be preferred choices for lowering LDL-C. Additionally, tafolecimab (either Q2W or Q4W) appears to be the most effective agent for reducing lipoprotein(a) levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4136741
Primary Topic
Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4136741: Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors and Lipid Reduction: A Network Meta-Analysis

Yujie Zhou, Hua Shen, Meng Chai
Circulation
Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
article

Abstract 4136741: Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors and Lipid Reduction: A Network Meta-Analysis

Yujie Zhou, Hua Shen, Meng Chai
article en

Abstract

Background: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors offer additional lipid reduction beyond that achieved with statins. However, the optimal PCSK9 therapy for lowering lipid levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia and/or hyperlipidemia on background statin therapy remains unclear. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for RCTs assessing tafolecimab, evolocumab or alirocumab vs. placebo (administrated Q2W or Q4W, 12-week treatment) in patients with hypercholesterolemia and/or hyperlipidemia on medium-intensity statin up to March 28, 2024. The outcomes of interest were the percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) or lipoprotein(a) from baseline to the 12th week. A frequentist random-effect network meta-analysis was applied to calculate MD and 95% CI using Stata 16.0 software. Results: A total of 4960 patients [PCSK9 inhibitors (n=3230), placebo (n=1730)] across 13 RCTs were included. At week 12, tafolecimab, evolocumab and alirocumab (either Q2W or Q4W) all induced significant reductions in LDL-C levels compared to placebo ( Figure ). The efficacy of evolocumab Q2W was significantly higher compared with alirocumab Q2W (MD=-18.67%, 95% Cl [-29.59%, -7.74%]), while similar LDL-C reduction was observed in tafolecimab Q2W vs. alirocumab Q2W and evolocumab Q2W vs. tafolecimab Q2W. Furthermore, tafolecimab Q4W and evolocumab Q4W were more effective in lowering LDL-C levels compared to alirocumab Q4W (tafolecimab vs. alirocumab: MD=-23.66%, 95% Cl [-32.58%, -14.74%]; evolocumab vs. alirocumab: MD=-25.84%, 95% Cl [-34.21%, -17.46%]), while there was no difference between evolocumab Q4W and tafolecimab Q4W. Lastly, the ranking of the effects for reducing lipoprotein(a) levels was as follows: tafolecimab > evolocumab> alirocumab (either Q2W or Q4W). Conclusions: In patients with hypercholesterolemia and/or hyperlipidemia treated with medium-intensity statins, tafolecimab and evolocumab (either Q2W or Q4W) might be preferred choices for lowering LDL-C. Additionally, tafolecimab (either Q2W or Q4W) appears to be the most effective agent for reducing lipoprotein(a) levels.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Beijing Anzhen Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.