Abstract 4136819: Necrotizing Enterocolitis is More Common After Hybrid Stage 1 Palliation Than Norwood Without Clear Risk Factors

Background: Infants with congenital heart disease are at high risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), with increased morbidity and mortality compared to infants without heart disease who develop NEC. Shunted single ventricle patients are at even higher risk. The hybrid stage 1 palliation (HS1P) is an alternative to the Norwood procedure for high-risk single ventricle patients or as initial palliation for patients with future two ventricle repair, as bridge to transplant, or as destination therapy. Few small studies have shown similar or slightly higher rates of NEC after HS1P compared to after Norwood. Aims: To evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of NEC in HS1P versus Norwood patients. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of all neonates who underwent HS1P or Norwood procedure from 2011-2022. Demographic data and episodes of NEC (defined using modified Bell’s criteria) were collected. NEC incidences and risk factors were compared between HS1P and Norwood patients using Chi-square test. For HS1P patients, more extensive data were collected including planned and final physiologic outcomes (single ventricle palliation, biventricular repair, transplant, and destination) and primary patient risk factors that led to HS1P. Risk factors and clinical outcomes of HS1P patients with and without NEC were compared using standard univariate tests. Results: The cumulative incidence of NEC in the HS1P group was 53% versus 37% in the Norwood group (p=0.01) and HS1P patients had more NEC episodes than the Norwood group (median 2 vs 1, p=0.03). Suspected NEC (stage 1A/1B) accounted for 70-75% of NEC cases in both groups. Only two infants, both in the HS1P group, had surgical (stage 3B) NEC. We found no differences in baseline demographics between patients with and without NEC in both HS1P and Norwood groups. In the HS1P group, NEC was associated with longer hospital length of stay (LOS), (median 49 days vs 23 days, p<0.0001) and greater need for tube feeds at 1 year (32% of the NEC group exclusively orally fed versus 43% of the non-NEC group, p=0.03). Final physiologic outcome was not associated with development of NEC in the HS1P group (p=0.38). Conclusions: While the exact risk factors or predictors are not clear, NEC is more common after HS1P compared to Norwoods and is associated with longer hospital LOS and late feeding difficulty. Further studies to better understand the physiologic causes of NEC in the HS1P population are needed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4136819
Primary Topic
Infant Nutrition and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4136819: Necrotizing Enterocolitis is More Common After Hybrid Stage 1 Palliation Than Norwood Without Clear Risk Factors

Jennifer Romano, Ray Lowery, Sunkyung Yu, Alyson R. Pierick et al.
Circulation
Infant Nutrition and Health
article

Abstract 4136819: Necrotizing Enterocolitis is More Common After Hybrid Stage 1 Palliation Than Norwood Without Clear Risk Factors

Jennifer Romano, Ray Lowery, Sunkyung Yu, Alyson R. Pierick, Courtney Strohacker, Jeffrey D. Zampi, Hillary Liken, C. Todd Sower, Ashley Duimstra
article en

Abstract

Background: Infants with congenital heart disease are at high risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), with increased morbidity and mortality compared to infants without heart disease who develop NEC. Shunted single ventricle patients are at even higher risk. The hybrid stage 1 palliation (HS1P) is an alternative to the Norwood procedure for high-risk single ventricle patients or as initial palliation for patients with future two ventricle repair, as bridge to transplant, or as destination therapy. Few small studies have shown similar or slightly higher rates of NEC after HS1P compared to after Norwood. Aims: To evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of NEC in HS1P versus Norwood patients. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of all neonates who underwent HS1P or Norwood procedure from 2011-2022. Demographic data and episodes of NEC (defined using modified Bell’s criteria) were collected. NEC incidences and risk factors were compared between HS1P and Norwood patients using Chi-square test. For HS1P patients, more extensive data were collected including planned and final physiologic outcomes (single ventricle palliation, biventricular repair, transplant, and destination) and primary patient risk factors that led to HS1P. Risk factors and clinical outcomes of HS1P patients with and without NEC were compared using standard univariate tests. Results: The cumulative incidence of NEC in the HS1P group was 53% versus 37% in the Norwood group (p=0.01) and HS1P patients had more NEC episodes than the Norwood group (median 2 vs 1, p=0.03). Suspected NEC (stage 1A/1B) accounted for 70-75% of NEC cases in both groups. Only two infants, both in the HS1P group, had surgical (stage 3B) NEC. We found no differences in baseline demographics between patients with and without NEC in both HS1P and Norwood groups. In the HS1P group, NEC was associated with longer hospital length of stay (LOS), (median 49 days vs 23 days, p<0.0001) and greater need for tube feeds at 1 year (32% of the NEC group exclusively orally fed versus 43% of the non-NEC group, p=0.03). Final physiologic outcome was not associated with development of NEC in the HS1P group (p=0.38). Conclusions: While the exact risk factors or predictors are not clear, NEC is more common after HS1P compared to Norwoods and is associated with longer hospital LOS and late feeding difficulty. Further studies to better understand the physiologic causes of NEC in the HS1P population are needed.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Infant Nutrition and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.