Abstract 4137135: Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support After the New Heart Allocation Policy

Background: In October 2018 a new heart allocation policy (NHAP) was implemented, which resulted in patients with Intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) being upgraded to status-two. We sought to determine practice pattern changes in mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use as a result of the NHAP. Hypothesis: Changes in the new heart allocation policy may lead to shifts in choice of mechanical circulatory support. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2017–2020. Hospitalizations for cardiogenic shock were identified, and stratified based on whether the patients were admitted before or after the NHAP. Baseline characteristics were compared between these cohorts, and the primary outcome of interest was the use of MCS and transplant before and after the NHAP. Subgroup analyses included patients only in transplant centers, non-transplant centers, and those who eventually underwent transplant. Results: A total of 689,935 hospitalizations were included in the final analysis, of which 279,230 (40.5%) were before the NHAP, and 410,705 (59.5%) were after. In allcomers, hospitalizations after the NHAP were less likely to undergo IABP (Adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.81, p<0.01) and LVAD (Adjusted OR 0.73, p<0.01). These findings were consistent in most subgroup analyses. Patients who underwent transplant after the NHAP however were more than twice as likely to have received a IABP compared to those admitted prior to the NHAP (adjusted OR 2.58; p<0.01). Conclusion: IABP placement after the NHAP increased in patients who underwent transplant, as opposed to allcomers or patients who did not undergo transplant. This change in utilization of MCS may be reflective of perceived benefits and biases in regards to transplantation candidacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4137135
Primary Topic
Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4137135: Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support After the New Heart Allocation Policy

Udhay Krishnan, Ethan Katznelson, Daniel C. Lu, Robert Beale et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
article

Abstract 4137135: Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support After the New Heart Allocation Policy

Udhay Krishnan, Ethan Katznelson, Daniel C. Lu, Robert Beale, Diala Steitieh, Elizabeth A. Feldman, Luke Kim, Dilan Minutello
article en

Abstract

Background: In October 2018 a new heart allocation policy (NHAP) was implemented, which resulted in patients with Intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) being upgraded to status-two. We sought to determine practice pattern changes in mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use as a result of the NHAP. Hypothesis: Changes in the new heart allocation policy may lead to shifts in choice of mechanical circulatory support. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2017–2020. Hospitalizations for cardiogenic shock were identified, and stratified based on whether the patients were admitted before or after the NHAP. Baseline characteristics were compared between these cohorts, and the primary outcome of interest was the use of MCS and transplant before and after the NHAP. Subgroup analyses included patients only in transplant centers, non-transplant centers, and those who eventually underwent transplant. Results: A total of 689,935 hospitalizations were included in the final analysis, of which 279,230 (40.5%) were before the NHAP, and 410,705 (59.5%) were after. In allcomers, hospitalizations after the NHAP were less likely to undergo IABP (Adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.81, p<0.01) and LVAD (Adjusted OR 0.73, p<0.01). These findings were consistent in most subgroup analyses. Patients who underwent transplant after the NHAP however were more than twice as likely to have received a IABP compared to those admitted prior to the NHAP (adjusted OR 2.58; p<0.01). Conclusion: IABP placement after the NHAP increased in patients who underwent transplant, as opposed to allcomers or patients who did not undergo transplant. This change in utilization of MCS may be reflective of perceived benefits and biases in regards to transplantation candidacy.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Cornell University (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.