Abstract 4137107: The Impact of Race in the Evaluation Process for Advanced Heart Failure Therapies

Introduction: Racial and socioeconomic disparities in heart failure therapy and heart transplantation have been well described. Potential racial disparities during the evaluation process for advanced heart failure (AHF) therapies is not well understood. We examined whether there were differences by race in the evaluation process for heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Methods: Adult patients who underwent heart transplant or LVAD evaluation between May 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2022 at the University of North Carolina Medical Center were included. Logistic regression models assessed whether approval for heart transplant listing or LVAD implantation differed by race. The multivariate model adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics, LVEF, RV function, and substance use. Secondary outcomes assessed included the time between critical points in the evaluation process: first clinical encounter with an AHF specialist, evaluation initiation, and final decision. Results: The study cohort included 611 patients (304 non-Hispanic Black patients, 307 non-Hispanic White patients). Black patients were younger than White patients (52.4 vs. 60.7 years), less male-predominant (65.5% vs. 81.4%), with less ischemic cardiomyopathy (16.8% vs. 58.3%, all p<0.05). There was no significant difference in approval for advanced therapies between Black and White patients (unadjusted OR [95% CI]: 1.24 [0.90-1.72]; adjusted OR 0.98 [0.64-1.48]). Male sex was associated with a higher likelihood of approval for AHF therapies (adjusted OR 1.55 [1.02-2.36]). Age (OR 0.98 [0.96-0.99]) and creatinine (OR 0.66 [0.53-0.82]) were associated with a lower likelihood of approval for AHF therapies. Black patients had a significantly longer time interval from the first AHF specialist encounter to the initiation of evaluation for AHF therapies (median 45.5 vs. 14 days, p <0.01), and from the initiation of the evaluation process to the final decision (25.5 vs. 14 days, p <0.01). Conclusions: Male patients had a greater approval rate for advanced heart failure therapies. Black and white patients did not have significantly different approval rates for LVAD implantation or listing for heart transplantation. However, the evaluation process was longer for black patients. Further work is needed to investigate which factors contribute to these racial and sex differences in the evaluation and approval process for advanced heart failure therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4137107
Primary Topic
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4137107: The Impact of Race in the Evaluation Process for Advanced Heart Failure Therapies

Patricia P. Chang, Quefeng Li, Dalton Sherwood, C A Wills et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
article

Abstract 4137107: The Impact of Race in the Evaluation Process for Advanced Heart Failure Therapies

Patricia P. Chang, Quefeng Li, Dalton Sherwood, C A Wills, Mirnela Byku, Khoula Saleem, Randall Watkins
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Racial and socioeconomic disparities in heart failure therapy and heart transplantation have been well described. Potential racial disparities during the evaluation process for advanced heart failure (AHF) therapies is not well understood. We examined whether there were differences by race in the evaluation process for heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Methods: Adult patients who underwent heart transplant or LVAD evaluation between May 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2022 at the University of North Carolina Medical Center were included. Logistic regression models assessed whether approval for heart transplant listing or LVAD implantation differed by race. The multivariate model adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics, LVEF, RV function, and substance use. Secondary outcomes assessed included the time between critical points in the evaluation process: first clinical encounter with an AHF specialist, evaluation initiation, and final decision. Results: The study cohort included 611 patients (304 non-Hispanic Black patients, 307 non-Hispanic White patients). Black patients were younger than White patients (52.4 vs. 60.7 years), less male-predominant (65.5% vs. 81.4%), with less ischemic cardiomyopathy (16.8% vs. 58.3%, all p<0.05). There was no significant difference in approval for advanced therapies between Black and White patients (unadjusted OR [95% CI]: 1.24 [0.90-1.72]; adjusted OR 0.98 [0.64-1.48]). Male sex was associated with a higher likelihood of approval for AHF therapies (adjusted OR 1.55 [1.02-2.36]). Age (OR 0.98 [0.96-0.99]) and creatinine (OR 0.66 [0.53-0.82]) were associated with a lower likelihood of approval for AHF therapies. Black patients had a significantly longer time interval from the first AHF specialist encounter to the initiation of evaluation for AHF therapies (median 45.5 vs. 14 days, p <0.01), and from the initiation of the evaluation process to the final decision (25.5 vs. 14 days, p <0.01). Conclusions: Male patients had a greater approval rate for advanced heart failure therapies. Black and white patients did not have significantly different approval rates for LVAD implantation or listing for heart transplantation. However, the evaluation process was longer for black patients. Further work is needed to investigate which factors contribute to these racial and sex differences in the evaluation and approval process for advanced heart failure therapies.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of North Carolina Health Care (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.