Abstract 4136889: Impact of hypercholesterolemia definitions on prevalence and prognosis of patients without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Background: In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), recent studies have intriguingly reported that up to a quarter of AMI patients have none of the 4 main standard modifiable cardiovascular (CV) risk factors (SMuRFs) (i.e. hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypercholesterolemia (HC), and smoking) and have worse mortality. Hypothesis: We tested the hypothesis that the prevalence and prognosis of SMuRF-less patients varies with the definition of risk factors. Aim: Using a French nationwide MI cohort, we aimed to compare SMuRF-less ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) patients according to 2 HC definitions, given the possibility of using several HC criteria. Methods: The French Cohort of Myocardial Infarction Evaluation (FRENCHIE) is a large ongoing AMI cohort, collecting data from all patients hospitalized for AMI < 48 h of symptom onset in 21 French centers. STEMI patients without prior CAD admitted in 2019 to 2022 were studied. DM was defined as prior DM diagnosis, HbA1c>7% or anti-diabetic medications, ongoing or at discharge, HTN was defined as treated or previous HTN diagnosis and smoking was defined as current smoking within the past month. Restrictive HC (RHC) was defined as either a previous diagnosis of HC or statin therapy. Permissive HC (PHC) was defined as previous diagnosis of HC or lipid-lowering therapy, or LDL-C > 135 mg/dL or total Cholesterol > 213 mg/dL. Results: Among 8008 patients (mean age 61.5± 12.9y, 22.6% women), 41.4% were smokers, 17.4% had diabetes, and 38.5% HTN. According to HC definitions, the prevalence of HC almost doubled, ranging from 30.3% for RHC to 61.0% for PHC. Consequently, the prevalence of SMuRF-less was divided by ≈ two (21.1% vs 11.3%, respectively), depending on the definition of HC used. Age and sex-adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that PHC, but not RHC, was associated with lower odds of in-hospital death ( figure ). Moreover, having multiple SMuRFs was associated with higher risk of mortality than no SMuRF when using RHC, but not with PHC definition. Conclusion: The prevalence and impact on acute mortality of being SMURFless varies largely with the definition of HC. More research is needed, using HC standardized definitions to explore these patients. Frenchie: was supported in part by the RHU iVASC grant ANR-16-RHUS-00010 from the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the Investissements d’Avenir program. The FRENCHIE cohort is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04050956.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4136889
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4136889: Impact of hypercholesterolemia definitions on prevalence and prognosis of patients without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Philippe Gabríel Steg, Cyril Prieur, D Sauze, Nicolas Danchin et al.
Circulation
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Abstract 4136889: Impact of hypercholesterolemia definitions on prevalence and prognosis of patients without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Philippe Gabríel Steg, Cyril Prieur, D Sauze, Nicolas Danchin, Marianne Zeller, Tabassome Simon, Alexandra Rousseau, Vincent Auffret, Guillaume Cayla, Yves Cottin, Pascal Goube
article en

Abstract

Background: In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), recent studies have intriguingly reported that up to a quarter of AMI patients have none of the 4 main standard modifiable cardiovascular (CV) risk factors (SMuRFs) (i.e. hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypercholesterolemia (HC), and smoking) and have worse mortality. Hypothesis: We tested the hypothesis that the prevalence and prognosis of SMuRF-less patients varies with the definition of risk factors. Aim: Using a French nationwide MI cohort, we aimed to compare SMuRF-less ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) patients according to 2 HC definitions, given the possibility of using several HC criteria. Methods: The French Cohort of Myocardial Infarction Evaluation (FRENCHIE) is a large ongoing AMI cohort, collecting data from all patients hospitalized for AMI < 48 h of symptom onset in 21 French centers. STEMI patients without prior CAD admitted in 2019 to 2022 were studied. DM was defined as prior DM diagnosis, HbA1c>7% or anti-diabetic medications, ongoing or at discharge, HTN was defined as treated or previous HTN diagnosis and smoking was defined as current smoking within the past month. Restrictive HC (RHC) was defined as either a previous diagnosis of HC or statin therapy. Permissive HC (PHC) was defined as previous diagnosis of HC or lipid-lowering therapy, or LDL-C > 135 mg/dL or total Cholesterol > 213 mg/dL. Results: Among 8008 patients (mean age 61.5± 12.9y, 22.6% women), 41.4% were smokers, 17.4% had diabetes, and 38.5% HTN. According to HC definitions, the prevalence of HC almost doubled, ranging from 30.3% for RHC to 61.0% for PHC. Consequently, the prevalence of SMuRF-less was divided by ≈ two (21.1% vs 11.3%, respectively), depending on the definition of HC used. Age and sex-adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that PHC, but not RHC, was associated with lower odds of in-hospital death ( figure ). Moreover, having multiple SMuRFs was associated with higher risk of mortality than no SMuRF when using RHC, but not with PHC definition. Conclusion: The prevalence and impact on acute mortality of being SMURFless varies largely with the definition of HC. More research is needed, using HC standardized definitions to explore these patients. Frenchie: was supported in part by the RHU iVASC grant ANR-16-RHUS-00010 from the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the Investissements d’Avenir program. The FRENCHIE cohort is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04050956.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Université de Bourgogne (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (FR), Hôpital Européen (FR), Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien (FR), Hôpital Louis Pradel (FR), Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes (FR), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.