Tissue source may affect the esophageal flora in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The aim of the present study was to provide a theoretical basis for the selection of standard sampling methods in the study of the esophageal microbiota in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) by comparing the differences in bacterial communities between surgical and endoscopic esophageal mucosal tissues. A total of 72 patients with ESCC who were diagnosed at Taihe Hospital (Shiyan, China) between July 2018 and July 2019 were selected to participate in the present study. The sequence V<sub>4</sub> hypervariable region was amplified, and Illumina HiSeq sequencing was performed to analyze the differences between the two groups. The Shannon and Chao1 indices of the postoperative esophageal cancer tissue group samples (Group A) were higher than those of the esophageal mucosa tissue samples (Group B), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The Simpson index of Group A was higher than that of Group B, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The β diversity analysis demonstrated that the overall composition of the flora of the two groups was not significantly different. Linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis showed that the abundance of <i>Megasphaera, Actinobacteria, Enterobacteriaceae</i> and <i>Enterobacteriales</i> in Group A was significantly higher than that in Group B, but the abundance of <i>Mogibacteriaceae</i> in Group B was significantly higher than that in Group A. The top 60 species were selected using the random forest method to establish a model. The error rate of the prediction model constructed using the random forest method was 22.59%. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis confirmed that the present model was reliable and could effectively distinguish between the two groups of samples (area under the curve, 0.86). The source of the sample should be considered in studies investigating the esophageal flora. Considering the increased richness and improved uniformity of postoperative tissue microbiota compared with the mucosal group, it was predicted that postoperative tissue may be more conducive to the study of esophageal cancer microbiota.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oncology Letters
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2024.14802
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tissue source may affect the esophageal flora in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Shuixiang He, Jian-Chao Meng, Jianrui Zhou, Qiang Tong et al.
1 citations
Oncology Letters
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
0.57
article

Tissue source may affect the esophageal flora in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Shuixiang He, Jian-Chao Meng, Jianrui Zhou, Qiang Tong, Hui Wen, Xiaobo Liu, Wen Xu, Zi-ye Gao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to provide a theoretical basis for the selection of standard sampling methods in the study of the esophageal microbiota in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) by comparing the differences in bacterial communities between surgical and endoscopic esophageal mucosal tissues. A total of 72 patients with ESCC who were diagnosed at Taihe Hospital (Shiyan, China) between July 2018 and July 2019 were selected to participate in the present study. The sequence V<sub>4</sub> hypervariable region was amplified, and Illumina HiSeq sequencing was performed to analyze the differences between the two groups. The Shannon and Chao1 indices of the postoperative esophageal cancer tissue group samples (Group A) were higher than those of the esophageal mucosa tissue samples (Group B), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The Simpson index of Group A was higher than that of Group B, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The β diversity analysis demonstrated that the overall composition of the flora of the two groups was not significantly different. Linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis showed that the abundance of <i>Megasphaera, Actinobacteria, Enterobacteriaceae</i> and <i>Enterobacteriales</i> in Group A was significantly higher than that in Group B, but the abundance of <i>Mogibacteriaceae</i> in Group B was significantly higher than that in Group A. The top 60 species were selected using the random forest method to establish a model. The error rate of the prediction model constructed using the random forest method was 22.59%. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis confirmed that the present model was reliable and could effectively distinguish between the two groups of samples (area under the curve, 0.86). The source of the sample should be considered in studies investigating the esophageal flora. Considering the increased richness and improved uniformity of postoperative tissue microbiota compared with the mucosal group, it was predicted that postoperative tissue may be more conducive to the study of esophageal cancer microbiota.

Oncology LettersVol. 29(1)
Hubei University of Medicine (CN), Taihe Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Health Commission of Hubei Province, Key Research and Development Projects of Shaanxi Province
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.