Responding to platform firm power: differing national responses

Aware of the power of platform firms and the risks of the platform economy, governments are reconsidering the dominant laissez faire approach in favour of strategies that regulate the power of platform firms. transnational dynamics play an important role in shaping emerging national regimes, but we argue that governments are also influenced by three factors that operate primarily at domestic level: the agency of platform firms, the impact of first-mover US platforms, and domestic politics. We illustrate our approach through an analysis of the trajectories and regulatory measures of four economies: the US, the EU, China, and India. As governance efforts expand to emerging technologies such as AI, our analysis presages broader changes to the structure of what was, with a few important exceptions, a relatively borderless global online economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Political Economy
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2024.2418075
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responding to platform firm power: differing national responses

John Zysman, Angela García Calvo, Martín Kenney
5 citations
New Political Economy
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
5.66
article

Responding to platform firm power: differing national responses

John Zysman, Angela García Calvo, Martín Kenney
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Aware of the power of platform firms and the risks of the platform economy, governments are reconsidering the dominant laissez faire approach in favour of strategies that regulate the power of platform firms. transnational dynamics play an important role in shaping emerging national regimes, but we argue that governments are also influenced by three factors that operate primarily at domestic level: the agency of platform firms, the impact of first-mover US platforms, and domestic politics. We illustrate our approach through an analysis of the trajectories and regulatory measures of four economies: the US, the EU, China, and India. As governance efforts expand to emerging technologies such as AI, our analysis presages broader changes to the structure of what was, with a few important exceptions, a relatively borderless global online economy.

New Political EconomyVol. 30(2)
Henley College (GB), University of California System (US), Business Roundtable (US), University of California, Davis (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
5.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Responding to platform firm power: differing national responses — John Zysman, Angela García Calvo, et al. · New Political Economy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS