Strong Kleene Logics as a Tool for Modelling Formal Epistemic Norms

In this paper, we present two ways of modelling every epistemic formal conditional commitment that involves (at most) three key epistemic attitudes: acceptance, rejection and neither acceptance nor rejection. The first one consists of adopting the plurality of every mixed Strong Kleene logic (along with an epistemic reading of the truth-values), and the second one involves the use of a unified system of six-sided inferences, named 6SK, that recovers the validities of each mixed Strong Kleene logic. We also introduce a sequent calculus that is sound and complete with respect to both approaches. We compare both accounts, and finally, we suggest that the plurality of Strong Kleene logic as well as the general framework 6SK are linked to formal epistemic norms via bridge principles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Logic and Logical Philosophy
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12775/llp.2024.029
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strong Kleene Logics as a Tool for Modelling Formal Epistemic Norms

Joaquín Toranzo Calderón, Federico Pailos, Agustina Borzi
1 citations
Logic and Logical Philosophy
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
0.35
article

Strong Kleene Logics as a Tool for Modelling Formal Epistemic Norms

Joaquín Toranzo Calderón, Federico Pailos, Agustina Borzi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we present two ways of modelling every epistemic formal conditional commitment that involves (at most) three key epistemic attitudes: acceptance, rejection and neither acceptance nor rejection. The first one consists of adopting the plurality of every mixed Strong Kleene logic (along with an epistemic reading of the truth-values), and the second one involves the use of a unified system of six-sided inferences, named 6SK, that recovers the validities of each mixed Strong Kleene logic. We also introduce a sequent calculus that is sound and complete with respect to both approaches. We compare both accounts, and finally, we suggest that the plurality of Strong Kleene logic as well as the general framework 6SK are linked to formal epistemic norms via bridge principles.

Logic and Logical PhilosophyVol. 33(4)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), Robotics Research (United States) (US), National Research Council (RO), National Research Council (LK), National University of Technology (PK), University of Tübingen (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.