Large-scale investigations of the thermal radiation of hydrogen jet flames

For industrial applications dealing with hydrogen, the definition of safety distances and the assessment of possible hazards emanating from releases is mandatory. Since hydrogen is usually stored and transported under pressure, one scenario to be considered is the momentum driven release of hydrogen from a leakage with subsequent ignition. In this scenario, the emitted heat radiation from the resulting jet flame to the surroundings has to be determined to define adequate safety distances. For hydrocarbon flames, different jet flame models are available to assess the hazards resulting from an ignited jet release. Since hydrogen flames differ from hydrocarbon flames in their combustion behavior, it has to be checked if these models are also applicable for hydrogen. To evaluate the accuracy of these models for hydrogen jet flames, tests with a horizontal outlet at large-scale are carried out at the BAM Test Site for Technical Safety (BAM-TTS). Herein, the flame geometry and the heat radiation at defined locations in the surroundings are recorded for varying release parameters such as release pressure (currently up to max. 250 bar), mass flow (up to max. 0.175 kg/s) at an outlet diameter of 30 mm (with an upstream nozzle of 7.7 mm). The challenge here is the characterization of the flame geometry in an open environment and its impact on the thermal radiation. Existing heat radiation data from the literature are mostly based on unsteady outflow conditions. For a better comparability with the steady state jet flame models, the experiments presented here are focused on ensuring a constant mass flow over the release duration (currently 120 s) to obtain a stationary jet flame. In addition, stationary outflow tests with hydrocarbons (methane) were also carried out, which are intended to serve as reference tests for checking flame models based on hydrocarbon data. The comparison of the flame geometry shows that hydrogen jet flames with the same outlet mass flow have a greater flame length (average deviation of 15 %) but a smaller flame diameter than methane jet flames (average deviation of 17 %). Conclusions regarding thermal radiation show that the proportion of total combustion energy emitted as thermal radiation is lower for hydrogen ( x r a d = 0.04–0.09) than for methane ( x r a d = 0.06–0.1). A comparison of the surface emissive power (SEP) of the jet flame shows a SEP range of 7 kW/m 2 -15 kW/m 2 for hydrogen and 3 kW/m 2 - 9,5 kW/m 2 for methane. • Hydrogen jet flames are longer than methane jet flames at same mass flow. • Hydrogen jet flame have a lower radiant heat fraction than methane jet flames. • Deviation of radiant heat fraction for methane, probably due to low luminescence of flame. • Radiant heat fraction for hydrogen similar to values in literature. • Increasing outlet momentum decreases radiant heat fraction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105491
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Combustion and flame dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large-scale investigations of the thermal radiation of hydrogen jet flames

Alessandro Orchini, Martin Kluge, Bernd Schalau, Martin Schulze et al.
3 citations
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
Combustion and flame dynamics
1.12
article

Large-scale investigations of the thermal radiation of hydrogen jet flames

Alessandro Orchini, Martin Kluge, Bernd Schalau, Martin Schulze, Hanjo Kant, Christopher Bernardy, Abdel Karim Habib
article en
3 citations

Abstract

For industrial applications dealing with hydrogen, the definition of safety distances and the assessment of possible hazards emanating from releases is mandatory. Since hydrogen is usually stored and transported under pressure, one scenario to be considered is the momentum driven release of hydrogen from a leakage with subsequent ignition. In this scenario, the emitted heat radiation from the resulting jet flame to the surroundings has to be determined to define adequate safety distances. For hydrocarbon flames, different jet flame models are available to assess the hazards resulting from an ignited jet release. Since hydrogen flames differ from hydrocarbon flames in their combustion behavior, it has to be checked if these models are also applicable for hydrogen. To evaluate the accuracy of these models for hydrogen jet flames, tests with a horizontal outlet at large-scale are carried out at the BAM Test Site for Technical Safety (BAM-TTS). Herein, the flame geometry and the heat radiation at defined locations in the surroundings are recorded for varying release parameters such as release pressure (currently up to max. 250 bar), mass flow (up to max. 0.175 kg/s) at an outlet diameter of 30 mm (with an upstream nozzle of 7.7 mm). The challenge here is the characterization of the flame geometry in an open environment and its impact on the thermal radiation. Existing heat radiation data from the literature are mostly based on unsteady outflow conditions. For a better comparability with the steady state jet flame models, the experiments presented here are focused on ensuring a constant mass flow over the release duration (currently 120 s) to obtain a stationary jet flame. In addition, stationary outflow tests with hydrocarbons (methane) were also carried out, which are intended to serve as reference tests for checking flame models based on hydrocarbon data. The comparison of the flame geometry shows that hydrogen jet flames with the same outlet mass flow have a greater flame length (average deviation of 15 %) but a smaller flame diameter than methane jet flames (average deviation of 17 %). Conclusions regarding thermal radiation show that the proportion of total combustion energy emitted as thermal radiation is lower for hydrogen ( x r a d = 0.04–0.09) than for methane ( x r a d = 0.06–0.1). A comparison of the surface emissive power (SEP) of the jet flame shows a SEP range of 7 kW/m 2 -15 kW/m 2 for hydrogen and 3 kW/m 2 - 9,5 kW/m 2 for methane. • Hydrogen jet flames are longer than methane jet flames at same mass flow. • Hydrogen jet flame have a lower radiant heat fraction than methane jet flames. • Deviation of radiant heat fraction for methane, probably due to low luminescence of flame. • Radiant heat fraction for hydrogen similar to values in literature. • Increasing outlet momentum decreases radiant heat fraction.

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process IndustriesVol. 94
Federal Institute For Materials Research and Testing (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Combustion and flame dynamics
1.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.