Building Thermal Insulation Performance and economic benefits

Three different insulating scenarios were investigated using Energy-plus software, to study the effect of using expanded polystyrene boards on building energy consumption at the Libyan Center for Solar Energy Research and Studies. The three insulation scenarios with different polystyrene insulation thicknesses and densities were investigated. Polystyrene total cost, Payback period, total and net money saving using insulation, as well as the percentage gain were calculated for each case in the three investigated scenarios for 50 years. The most money saving scenarios after 50 years is by insulating the building roof and external walls with an average insulation thickness of 7 cm, reaching about 78000 L.D and a tariff of 0.9261 L.D /kWh. While the least money saving is the roof scenario with an insulation thickness of 2.5 cm, reaching more than 29000 L.D and the same tariff. The highest percentage gain values are 76 %, 103 % and1090 % at the roof scenario, 2.5 cm insulation thickness and energy tariffs of 0.15 L.D /kWh, 0.1732 L.D/kWh and 0.9261 L.D/kWh, respectively. While the lowest percentage gain values are about 17.5 %, 35.7 % and 725 % at the wall scenario 10 cm insulation thickness and energy tariffs of 0.15 L.D/kWh, 0.1732 L.D/kWh and 0.9261 L.D/kWh, respectively. the payback period of total insulation cost is significantly dependent on insulation thickness and energy tariff. These results show that low energy tariff (current energy tariff) values economically are not cost effective regarding the payback period. Consequently, prices do not motivate residents to save energy with the use of thermal insulation unless actual energy prices are considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Solar Energy and Sustainable Development
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51646/jsesd.v13i2.197
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building Thermal Insulation Performance and economic benefits

Faeeza Alghnain, ABDULMAGED OMER SALEM ALGAREU, Ikhlas Bernaz
Solar Energy and Sustainable Development
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Building Thermal Insulation Performance and economic benefits

Faeeza Alghnain, ABDULMAGED OMER SALEM ALGAREU, Ikhlas Bernaz
article en

Abstract

Three different insulating scenarios were investigated using Energy-plus software, to study the effect of using expanded polystyrene boards on building energy consumption at the Libyan Center for Solar Energy Research and Studies. The three insulation scenarios with different polystyrene insulation thicknesses and densities were investigated. Polystyrene total cost, Payback period, total and net money saving using insulation, as well as the percentage gain were calculated for each case in the three investigated scenarios for 50 years. The most money saving scenarios after 50 years is by insulating the building roof and external walls with an average insulation thickness of 7 cm, reaching about 78000 L.D and a tariff of 0.9261 L.D /kWh. While the least money saving is the roof scenario with an insulation thickness of 2.5 cm, reaching more than 29000 L.D and the same tariff. The highest percentage gain values are 76 %, 103 % and1090 % at the roof scenario, 2.5 cm insulation thickness and energy tariffs of 0.15 L.D /kWh, 0.1732 L.D/kWh and 0.9261 L.D/kWh, respectively. While the lowest percentage gain values are about 17.5 %, 35.7 % and 725 % at the wall scenario 10 cm insulation thickness and energy tariffs of 0.15 L.D/kWh, 0.1732 L.D/kWh and 0.9261 L.D/kWh, respectively. the payback period of total insulation cost is significantly dependent on insulation thickness and energy tariff. These results show that low energy tariff (current energy tariff) values economically are not cost effective regarding the payback period. Consequently, prices do not motivate residents to save energy with the use of thermal insulation unless actual energy prices are considered.

Solar Energy and Sustainable DevelopmentVol. 13(2)
Center for Solar Energy Research and Studies (LY)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.