Voices from the ground: Qualitative perspectives on Ugandan national mental health system strengths, challenges, and recommendations

Mental health capacity building is a growing priority in Ugandan healthcare systems. Despite increased governmental attention to community mental health and mental healthcare needs, no empirical assessments document qualitative perspectives from stakeholders in the Ugandan mental health system. The goal of the current needs assessment study was to systematically explore stakeholders' perceptions of strengths, challenges, and recommendations for enhancing capacity in the national mental health system in Uganda. Using ethnographic research methods, data were collected from 15 key informant interviews and four community focus groups with a total of 44 stakeholders involved in mental healthcare in Uganda. Thematic analyses of data yielded several themes in each domain, including 1) system strengths reflected in the existing policy and action plan, free medications, growing private sector, and partnerships and collaborations; 2) system challenges including socioeconomic constraints, stigma, and limited family engagement; and 3) recommendations surrounding enhanced education and training, integrating systemic approaches, and policy advocacy. We describe clinical, research, and policy implications that can inform systemic mental health efforts in Uganda and comparable global settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS mental health.
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000077
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Voices from the ground: Qualitative perspectives on Ugandan national mental health system strengths, challenges, and recommendations

Ronald Asiimwe, Rosco Kasujja, Lekie Dwanyen, Adrian J. Blow et al.
3 citations
PLOS mental health.
Mental Health Treatment and Access
1.93
article

Voices from the ground: Qualitative perspectives on Ugandan national mental health system strengths, challenges, and recommendations

Ronald Asiimwe, Rosco Kasujja, Lekie Dwanyen, Adrian J. Blow, Ibrahim Luberenga, Pendo Galukande
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Mental health capacity building is a growing priority in Ugandan healthcare systems. Despite increased governmental attention to community mental health and mental healthcare needs, no empirical assessments document qualitative perspectives from stakeholders in the Ugandan mental health system. The goal of the current needs assessment study was to systematically explore stakeholders' perceptions of strengths, challenges, and recommendations for enhancing capacity in the national mental health system in Uganda. Using ethnographic research methods, data were collected from 15 key informant interviews and four community focus groups with a total of 44 stakeholders involved in mental healthcare in Uganda. Thematic analyses of data yielded several themes in each domain, including 1) system strengths reflected in the existing policy and action plan, free medications, growing private sector, and partnerships and collaborations; 2) system challenges including socioeconomic constraints, stigma, and limited family engagement; and 3) recommendations surrounding enhanced education and training, integrating systemic approaches, and policy advocacy. We describe clinical, research, and policy implications that can inform systemic mental health efforts in Uganda and comparable global settings.

PLOS mental health.Vol. 1(6)
University of Minnesota (US), Michigan United (US), Makerere University (UG), Michigan State University (US)
Michigan State University, College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
1.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.