Mapping the potential of managed aquifer recharge in Africa: GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis approach

Africa faces numerous challenges related to rainfall variability, droughts, water scarcity, and climate change. Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR)- groundwater recharge and underground water storage for later use or environmental support presents a viable alternative for water storage and may provide an effective tool for coping with such challenges. However, the potential area where MAR can be feasibly implemented has not been identified. This study mapped MAR feasibility using a Geographic Information System-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (GIS-MCDA) and assessed MAR potential in Africa. The methodology focused on three key pillars of MAR feasibility: intrinsic suitability based on biophysical parameters, water source availability, and water demand. Maps responding to these pillars were developed and combined to create a composite MAR feasibility map. Results show that 18% of the continental area falls into the low feasibility class, 73% into the moderate feasibility class, and 7% into the high feasibility class. The feasibility map was validated against 17 existing MAR schemes in Africa, demonstrating a good correlation between their locations and areas with MAR potential. Results of sensitivity analysis of criteria weights of the biophysical parameters show that geology is the most influential criterion, followed by slope. In general, this first feasibility assessment shows good potential for MAR implementation in Africa. Therefore, MAR should be considered prominently among other water storage options for resilience building in Africa and policymakers should ensure adequate resource allocation for its implementation. The feasibility map can be used to guide MAR planning and investment decisions. • GIS-MCDA was used to assess MAR feasibility. • MAR feasibility was assessed based on biophysical factors, water availability, and demand. • This is the first continent-wide MAR feasibility assessment in Africa. • Nearly three-quarters of Africa has moderate MAR feasibility. • The map aids in raising awareness, planning, and decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Groundwater for Sustainable Development
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101374
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the potential of managed aquifer recharge in Africa: GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis approach

Catalin Stefan, Jana Sallwey, Girma Yimer Ebrahim, Jonathan Lautze
8 citations
Groundwater for Sustainable Development
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
1.65
article

Mapping the potential of managed aquifer recharge in Africa: GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis approach

Catalin Stefan, Jana Sallwey, Girma Yimer Ebrahim, Jonathan Lautze
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Africa faces numerous challenges related to rainfall variability, droughts, water scarcity, and climate change. Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR)- groundwater recharge and underground water storage for later use or environmental support presents a viable alternative for water storage and may provide an effective tool for coping with such challenges. However, the potential area where MAR can be feasibly implemented has not been identified. This study mapped MAR feasibility using a Geographic Information System-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (GIS-MCDA) and assessed MAR potential in Africa. The methodology focused on three key pillars of MAR feasibility: intrinsic suitability based on biophysical parameters, water source availability, and water demand. Maps responding to these pillars were developed and combined to create a composite MAR feasibility map. Results show that 18% of the continental area falls into the low feasibility class, 73% into the moderate feasibility class, and 7% into the high feasibility class. The feasibility map was validated against 17 existing MAR schemes in Africa, demonstrating a good correlation between their locations and areas with MAR potential. Results of sensitivity analysis of criteria weights of the biophysical parameters show that geology is the most influential criterion, followed by slope. In general, this first feasibility assessment shows good potential for MAR implementation in Africa. Therefore, MAR should be considered prominently among other water storage options for resilience building in Africa and policymakers should ensure adequate resource allocation for its implementation. The feasibility map can be used to guide MAR planning and investment decisions. • GIS-MCDA was used to assess MAR feasibility. • MAR feasibility was assessed based on biophysical factors, water availability, and demand. • This is the first continent-wide MAR feasibility assessment in Africa. • Nearly three-quarters of Africa has moderate MAR feasibility. • The map aids in raising awareness, planning, and decision-making.

Groundwater for Sustainable DevelopmentVol. 27
International Water Management Institute (ZA), International Water Management Institute (ET), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
1.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.