Hepatitis C Infection Confirmation and Fewer Visits Contribute to Improving Treatment Rates in a Predominantly African American Health Center

Background/Objectives: The approval of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C (HCV) resulted in a highly effective oral treatment for patients. The primary objective of this study was to identify reasons that patients were not treated versus why patients were treated. Identifying potential reasons for the failure to treat can provide a pathway to interventions using evidence-based data. Methods: The electronic medical records in an urban predominately African American (AA) population were searched for all patients with HCV seen at least once in a Gastroenterology or Infectious Disease clinic in 2019. Data collected included demographics, treatment visits, laboratory data, insurance and ZIP codes for median income. Results: Of the 441 patients who were not yet treated at the first 2019 visit, only 43% were treated by July 2020. Insurance and median income were not factors in failure to treat. Patients with an average of four visits were more likely to be treated than those with two or less, suggesting that failure to follow up was a significant factor for patient treatment (42% vs. 8% p < 0.0001). Confirmation of viral infection at first visit was an important factor with respect to treatment (treated 38% vs. not treated 25% p < 0.02). Conclusions: Significant numbers of our patients (57%) failed to be treated after at least one clinic visit. The two critical factors were PCR confirmation prior to the initial visit and the requirement for multiple visits before the initiation of treatment. Since the degree of fibrosis had no impact on treatment, initiating treatment immediately after confirming infection with HCV should improve patient treatment rates and outcomes.