Media frame development of direct air capture 2011–2023: A comparative analysis of Europe and North America

Media portrayal of direct air capture (DAC) matters for public opinion and policy. How is DAC framed in the North American and European press, are there differences between the two, and what are the implications for public perceptions of DAC? This study provides an insight into the media frames of DAC in North American and European news articles, for the period 2011-2023. With no prior work on this topic, five generic media frames were used for classification purposes. While the study is intended to be exploratory rather than definitive, European articles were found to be more critical than North American articles, more often viewing DAC as an expensive mitigation option. North American articles highlighted the lack of government financial support for DAC. The employment and economic potential of DAC was acknowledged in both newspaper datasets. Although DAC is relatively little framed in relation to human interest, morality, or conflict, these frames may be important in shaping public opinion in future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111360
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Media frame development of direct air capture 2011–2023: A comparative analysis of Europe and North America

Paul Upham, Emina Ibrahimović
2 citations
iScience
Air Quality and Health Impacts
0.63
article

Media frame development of direct air capture 2011–2023: A comparative analysis of Europe and North America

Paul Upham, Emina Ibrahimović
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Media portrayal of direct air capture (DAC) matters for public opinion and policy. How is DAC framed in the North American and European press, are there differences between the two, and what are the implications for public perceptions of DAC? This study provides an insight into the media frames of DAC in North American and European news articles, for the period 2011-2023. With no prior work on this topic, five generic media frames were used for classification purposes. While the study is intended to be exploratory rather than definitive, European articles were found to be more critical than North American articles, more often viewing DAC as an expensive mitigation option. North American articles highlighted the lack of government financial support for DAC. The employment and economic potential of DAC was acknowledged in both newspaper datasets. Although DAC is relatively little framed in relation to human interest, morality, or conflict, these frames may be important in shaping public opinion in future.

iScienceVol. 27(12)
University of Groningen (NL)
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
0.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.